vices
that choose to employ geotargetted censorship of any material to comply
with requests that do not bear the force of law over their actual
operations are still in violation of this criterion. (C2)"
What do you think?
--
Zak Rogoff // Campaigns Manager
Free Software Foundation
signature
For your two questions, I think the best thing is to ask Richard
directly. He'll probably be able to answer very quickly.
--
Zak Rogoff // Campaigns Manager
Free Software Foundation
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ware, because otherwise you're subjugating users.
> What if you are compelled to make your software nonfree? Then you
> should not develop any software -- let others do it who can do it
> justly.
>
> It might be good to explain this point, so people understand our reasonin
ast one other shining example of an "Ethical
> Repository" to point at (and one that the kids will like too) - you are
> welcome to monitor my progress here
> https://notabug.org/bill-auger/gogs/issues - and feel free to join #freepost
> on freenode to meet the commun
Thanks for raising this concern. Is anyone available to open a dialogue
with the Savannah developers, offering to help them evaluate the
situation and make improvements?
--
Zak Rogoff // Campaigns Manager
Free Software Foundation
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
e
>> to keep track of new evaluations for the future.
>
> Thanks for sharing this---I hope that others will find it useful as
> well.
>
> Zak: where would this type of thing be appropriate to upload? The
> LibrePlanet wiki?
Yeah, the LP wiki would be the right place.
Th
or code hosting software,
which would not include scores but would include a link to the
evaluations page so people can cross-compare.
Thoughts?
--
Zak Rogoff // Campaigns Manager
Free Software Foundation
0xB5090AC8.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
