Re: [Reportbug-maint] Processed: #653738 is reproducible in jessie
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 16:00:07 + Sandro Tosi wrote: > could you explain what is your purpose with these bugs changes? Just trying to assist with bug triaging. > the bug was first found in 6.3.1, it's not fixed, so it's clearly in > jessie as well. >From my experience with other projects the fact that a bug against a previous version is still open does not automatically mean it still affects more recent or the latest released versions. Reporters are often explicitly asked to retest against latest version. I reproduced the issue while filing a bug on a jessie system where reportbug had not been configured yet, so it seemed like a useful thing to note the bug is still relevant, i.e. had not been fixed in the versions since the one in the original report. If that's not considered useful, feel free to direct me to RTFM so that I can do something more useful next time. ___ Reportbug-maint mailing list Reportbug-maint@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reportbug-maint
Re: [Reportbug-maint] Processed: #653738 is reproducible in jessie
On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 8:08 PM, Vilius Panevėžys wrote: > On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 16:00:07 + > Sandro Tosi wrote: > >> could you explain what is your purpose with these bugs changes? > > Just trying to assist with bug triaging. just give the maintainers an heads up if you plan to do more, as it might be not needed >> the bug was first found in 6.3.1, it's not fixed, so it's clearly in >> jessie as well. > > From my experience with other projects the fact that a bug against a > previous version is still open does not automatically mean it still > affects more recent or the latest released versions. Reporters are > often explicitly asked to retest against latest version. but not in this case right? so being marked as found in version prior to the one in jessie was already more than enough to be sure that it was not fixed in jessie (as it is not fixed at all) > I reproduced the issue while filing a bug on a jessie system where > reportbug had not been configured yet, so it seemed like a useful thing > to note the bug is still relevant, i.e. had not been fixed in the > versions since the one in the original report. the bug is open, so it is *not* fixed at all, from the version it was reported onwards. > If that's not considered useful, feel free to direct me to RTFM so that > I can do something more useful next time. you might want to have a look at how the Debian bts works first, bugs.debian.org (and the related section on wiki.debian.org) should be a good start -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+SandroTosi ___ Reportbug-maint mailing list Reportbug-maint@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reportbug-maint
[Reportbug-maint] Processed: #653738 is reproducible in jessie
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > found 653738 6.6.3 Bug #653738 [reportbug] Configuration routine not run if a package specified on first run Bug #705172 [reportbug] reportbug doesn't run first-time configuration when started with a package name Marked as found in versions reportbug/6.6.3. Marked as found in versions reportbug/6.6.3. > stop Stopping processing here. Please contact me if you need assistance. -- 653738: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653738 705172: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705172 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems ___ Reportbug-maint mailing list Reportbug-maint@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reportbug-maint
Re: [Reportbug-maint] Processed: #653738 is reproducible in jessie
could you explain what is your purpose with these bugs changes? the bug was first found in 6.3.1, it's not fixed, so it's clearly in jessie as well. On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 3:51 PM, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org: > >> found 653738 6.6.3 > Bug #653738 [reportbug] Configuration routine not run if a package specified > on first run > Bug #705172 [reportbug] reportbug doesn't run first-time configuration when > started with a package name > Marked as found in versions reportbug/6.6.3. > Marked as found in versions reportbug/6.6.3. >> stop > Stopping processing here. > > Please contact me if you need assistance. > -- > 653738: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=653738 > 705172: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=705172 > Debian Bug Tracking System > Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems > > ___ > Reportbug-maint mailing list > Reportbug-maint@lists.alioth.debian.org > http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reportbug-maint -- Sandro "morph" Tosi My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/ Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi G+: https://plus.google.com/u/0/+SandroTosi ___ Reportbug-maint mailing list Reportbug-maint@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reportbug-maint