WELCOME TO IWPR'S REPORTING CENTRAL ASIA, No. 642, February 22, 2011

FEAR AND REPRESSION IN “REFORMED” TURKMENISTAN  Four years after new president 
promised change, dissenting voices continue to be stamped out.  By Omar Seljuk, 
Inga Sikorskaya

UNPRECEDENTED TORTURE TRIAL IN KAZAKSTAN  Prison warders prosecuted in 
watershed case.  By Artur Nigmetov

KYRGYZ PETROL PRICE CUTS FAIL TO CURB INFLATION  Reduced prices at pumps offset 
by wider economic problems.  By Asyl Osmonalieva

**** NEW 
************************************************************************************

LATEST PROJECT REVIEWS: http://iwpr.net/make-an-impact/project-reviews 

VACANCIES: http://iwpr.net/what-we-do/vacancies 

**** IWPR RESOURCES 
******************************************************************

CENTRAL ASIA PROGRAMME HOME: http://www.iwpr.net/programme/central-asia 

CENTRAL ASIA RADIO: http://iwpr.net/programme/central-asia/central-asia-radio 

NEWS BRIEFING CENTRAL ASIA: 
http://iwpr.net/programme/news-briefing-central-asia 

CENTRAL ASIA HUMAN RIGHTS: 
http://iwpr.net/programme/central-asia-human-rights-reporting-project 

STORY BEHIND THE STORY: http://iwpr.net/report-news/the-story-behind-the-story 

BECOME A FAN OF IWPR ON FACEBOOK
http://facebook.com/InstituteforWarandPeaceReporting 

FOLLOW US ON TWITTER 
http://twitter.com/iwpr 

**** http://iwpr.net/ **********************************************************

DONATE TO IWPR: http://iwpr.net/donate 

**** http://iwpr.net/ **********************************************************

FEAR AND REPRESSION IN “REFORMED” TURKMENISTAN

Four years after new president promised change, dissenting voices continue to 
be stamped out.

By Omar Seljuk, Inga Sikorskaya

Despite Turkmenistan’s attempts to present itself abroad as a reformed state, 
people who live there say the atmosphere remains as repressive as ever. 

Fear of retribution for anything that might be perceived as disloyal towards 
authorities has created a climate of silence in which people put up with 
mistreatment without complaint.

When Gurbanguly Berdymuhammedov succeeded the late Saparmurat Niazov as 
president in 2007, he signalled a change of direction away from total 
repression.

In some areas like healthcare, education and culture, Berdymuhammedov reversed 
a series of restrictive and sometimes eccentric cutbacks imposed by his 
predecessor. But hints at reforms in other areas have either not materialised, 
or in the case of political pledges such as allowing opposition parties to 
operate, are patently designed to impress the international community and are 
not intended to come into being. (See Charm Offensive Belies Turkmen Reality.)

As in Niazov’s time, Turkmenistan is a one-party police state with no 
independent media. The security services are omnipresent, tapping phones, 
monitoring internet traffic, preventing anyone they regard as suspect from 
travelling out of the country, and generally intimidating anyone who complains 
about life in Turkmenistan.

Active dissidents and opposition supporters either went to jail or emigrated 
years ago, so the focus of harassment is on family members, including those of 
officials who fall from grace in one of Berdymuhammedov’s regular purges of 
government.

“We thought that [this] president would prove more humane than the last one, 
that the repression would stop and that the fear would go away, but things 
haven’t turned out that way at all,” an Ashgabat-based journalist said.

“We’re afraid to talk to people on the phone. A lot of people have been put 
behind bars because they let something slip during a telephone conversation.”

An elderly woman in the capital Ashgabat said she was summoned by the Ministry 
of National Security a couple of days after she complained about rising prices 
while on the phone to a relative in Ukraine. She was lucky to get away with an 
abject apology after a security officer pointed at Africa on a map on the wall 
and said, “That’s where they’ve got nothing. We have everything here – 
understand?”

It does not take much to get into trouble with the authorities.

A resident of the western town of Balkanabat described how both he and his wife 
lost their jobs after he asked for payment or time off in lieu because he was 
regularly required to work overtime.

“The managers told her, ‘Go and tell your husband to stop banging on about his 
rights or we will put you both behind bars’,” he said. “So now we’re both left 
without work.”

In Turkmenabat, a town close to the country’s eastern border with Uzbekistan, 
said people now feared prosecution “for a word misinterpreted, for expressing 
the wrong view”.

In this climate of fear, people knuckle under and say nothing when they are 
forced to turn out as a cheering crowd for some national celebration, to 
provide free labour for public works such as cleaning the streets, and for the 
all-important task of tending and picking the cotton crop. “Voluntary” 
collections are organised to fund government projects or ensure mass 
subscriptions to state newspapers.

“Everyone puts up with arbitrary treatment, as they know that standing up to it 
will have negative consequences,” a resident of Kunya-Urgench in northern 
Turkmenistan said.

Observers believe the blacklist of people barred from travelling outside 
Turkmenistan has increased since Berdymuhammedov came to power

“There are now more than 18.000 names of Turkmen citizens on it, ” Timur 
Misrikhanov, of the Netherland-based Association of Independent Lawyers. He 
noted that since then the list has almost doubled.

Approached to confirm the existence of a blacklist, an official with 
Turkmenistan’s migration service said he could lose his job if he showed too 
much interest in it.

An Ashgabat resident who gave her name as Anna said she had been barred from 
visiting relatives in Russia since 2006, when her brother was imprisoned.

Police and migration officials told her the ban could not be lifted, and now 
she does not approach them any more. “I’m afraid that asking about it could 
draw attention to us and lead to retribution against me and my family,” she 
explained.

Often, people do not realise they are on the no-travel list until they 
encounter delays getting the permits they need, or even until they are stopped 
at airport border controls.

The reasons are unexplained. In 2009, many Turkmen students studying in 
Kyrgyzstan were prevented from going back there after the summer holiday.

“Some of these young people still find themselves on the black list of people 
barred from travelling,” said a Turkmenabat resident, who had been considering 
sending his own son to study abroad but has thought better of it .

In January, President Berdymuhammedov strengthened the role of the migration 
service in a move seen as tightening up border controls even further. This 
followed a speech in September when he urged the security services to take 
vigorous action against anyone who slandered the “democratic, law-based and 
secular” state of Turkmenistan.

An analyst in the country was pessimistic about the future, saying criticism 
had been all but stamped out.

“The authorities will continue to deal ruthlessly with anyone who takes a 
stand, in order to perpetuate their hold on power for the long term,” he said.

One of the few remaining non-government activists in Ashgabat said the effect 
was to crush initiative and prevent Turkmenistan developing.

“The security services exercise power in the worst sense of the word,” he said. 
“To them, every citizen is a potential lawbreaker. This intensifies their 
instinct for repression, and leaves ordinary people feeling downtrodden.”

Omar Seljuk is the pseudonym of a journalist in Turkmenistan. Inga Sikorskaya 
is IWPR’s Senior Editor for Turkmenistan and Uzbekistan.

This article was produced jointly under two IWPR projects: Building Central 
Asian Human Rights Protection & Education Through the Media, funded by the 
European Commission; and the Human Rights Reporting, Confidence Building and 
Conflict Information Programme, funded by the Foreign Ministry of Norway.

The contents of this article are the sole responsibility of IWPR and can in no 
way be taken to reflect the views of either the European Union or the Foreign 
Ministry of Norway.


UNPRECEDENTED TORTURE TRIAL IN KAZAKSTAN

Prison warders prosecuted in watershed case.

By Artur Nigmetov

The first ever trial of prison officers accused of torturing an inmate has been 
hailed as a success for groups that monitor Kazakstan’s penal system. 

On February 7, court hearings resumed in the state’s case against five prison 
officers and four inmates entrusted with supervisory roles in the Zarechny 
prison camp near Almaty in southeast Kazakstan. All face charges of torturing 
27-year old Jandos Sagatov, who is serving a sentence for drug dealing. 

Trial proceedings, which began on January 18 and are being held at a court in 
the nearby town of Kapshagai, shifted to the Zarechny prison for this third 
session so as to allow cross-examination of prosecution witnesses drawn from 
the prison population.

Ardak Janabilova, who chairs the Public Commission for Human Rights Monitoring 
in Prisons in Almaty City and Region, recalls how the case first came to the 
attention of her non-government group, one of 15 providing external scrutiny of 
prisons in each region of Kazakstan.

In March 2010, Janabilova and other colleagues went to the Zarechny prison 
after an inmate tipped them off about an assault there.

“When we arrived, Jandos Sagatov was already in the prison infirmary. We 
identified numerous marks of beatings,” she said.

Sagatov underwent a series of major operations and is still under observation 
at the Kapshagai town hospital.

Janabilova’s commission reported the case to the prosecutor general’s office, 
adding to a complaint that Sagatov had filed himself. It also publicised the 
case in the media.

Sagatov’s lawyer Gaukhar Salimbaeva described how initially, prosecutors 
brought charges against the staff under the general clause of “exceeding one’s 
authority”, and grievous bodily harm in the case of the accused prisoners. In 
July, however, prosecutors strengthened both sets of accusations to the 
specific offence of torture, which carries a prison term of five to ten years.

Janabilova says this is a precedent-setting test case, successfully brought to 
trial through “a common effort by the public and the prosecution service”.

“Corruption has always been the main obstacle standing in the way of holding 
penal system staff to account,” she said.

Bribery is rife in the justice and penal system, and police, judges and others 
are reluctant to take action against their colleagues.

Vadim Kurmashin, a human rights activist in the northern city of Petropavlovsk, 
welcomed news of the court case, saying, “It is very gratifying that the public 
monioring committee took a firm stand on the Jandos Sagatov case. It’s the 
first time that those [allegedly] culpable have been held to account.”

Kurmashin claims that torture takes place in every penal facility in Kazakstan, 
and wants to see all such cases exposed as a matter of course so that prison 
staff never get away with it. All too often, he says, charges are not brought 
when allegations of torture and assault are made, and even if they are, they 
get dropped later on.

Both Kuramshin and Janabilova argue that physical mistreatment of prisoners and 
corruption within Kazakstan’s prisons are closely linked, and jointly 
contribute to a systemic resistance to external scrutiny.

According to Janabilova, prisoners who fail to pay up when warders extort money 
are liable to be mistreated and denied entitlements like packages and visits.

Poor conditions were highlighted by a series of protests in prisons across the 
country last year, when inmates mutilated themselves by slashing their 
stomachs. (See Kazak Prison Riots Highlight Poor Conditions.)

Rights activist Mahambet Abjan, a former prisoner, says many prison staff feel 
immune from the consequences of abuse, because pressure groups are not strong 
enough to challenge the system, and because prisoners fear reprisals if they 
complain.

“Civil society must be strong. Only then can corruption, torture and other 
forms of violence in prisons be uprooted,” Abjan said. “Convicts fear for their 
lives and endure torture in silence.”

A senior official with the government’s s in the Committee for the Penal 
Correction System, part of the justice ministry, acknowledged that torture and 
corruption exist, but insisted that they were by no means widespread and that 
the authorities were working to end them.

“I don’t think inmates are tortured in all prisons. It’s very rare,” the 
official said, speaking on condition of anonymity.

He pointed to the Sagatov case, saying it showed how the alleged culprits had 
been identified and brought before a court.

“As for corruption,” he continued, “I can say we have identified cases among 
the management and staff of prison camps, and they have all faced penalties.”

Artur Nigmetov is a journalist in Kazakstan.

This article was produced jointly under two IWPR projects: Building Central 
Asian Human Rights Protection & Education Through the Media, funded by the 
European Commission; and the Human Rights Reporting, Confidence Building and 
Conflict Information Programme, funded by the Foreign Ministry of Norway.

The contents of this article are the sole responsibility of IWPR and can in no 
way be taken to reflect the views of either the European Union or the Foreign 
Ministry of Norway.


KYRGYZ PETROL PRICE CUTS FAIL TO CURB INFLATION

Reduced prices at pumps offset by wider economic problems.

By Asyl Osmonalieva

A fall in petrol prices in Kyrgyzstan has so far failed to live up to hopes 
that it would curb galloping inflation in the wider economy.

In January, the price of the standard type of petrol went down from the 
equivalent of 76 US cents per litre to 68 cents after Russia – the main 
supplier – agreed to drop export duties for Kyrgyzstan.

The newly-formed coalition government hailed the agreement as a major success, 
as rising fuel costs over the last year had affected transport costs and 
spurred overall inflation rates.

Kyrgyzstan began experiencing a scarcity of fuel after neighbouring states 
closed their borders following the unrest of April 2010 which led to a change 
of regime and the ousting of President Kurmanbek Bakiev. At around the same 
time, Russia began implementing new regulations for its customs union with 
Kazakstan and Belarus, which meant that non-members were subject to higher 
export tariffs and had to pay much more for fuel. As a result of both 
developments, petrol prices rose by about 20 per cent in Kyrgyzstan.

At a February 3 press conference, Kyrgyzstan’s first deputy prime minister 
Omurbek Babanov promised a further cut in petrol prices later in the month, so 
that the overall reduction would come to 20 cents.

Officials are especially concerned about fuel costs because of the impact they 
have on the price of consumer goods and foodstuffs. The finance ministry says 
prices rose by 19 per cent last year, although economists like Jumakadyr 
Akeneev believe the increase was nearer to 25 per cent.

The owner of a cafe in the capital Bishkek who introduced himself as Azim 
described the knock-on effect that last year’s high petrol prices had on his 
business.

“Food prices shot up. We had to increase staff wages at the cafe because they 
were reluctant to work for what they were earning,” he said.

Retailers and others interviewed by IWPR said the fuel cost reduction to date 
had been too small to prompt them to cut their own prices.

A Bishkek resident who gave his name Kadyr, a former engineer turned taxi 
driver, said he was unable to start charging lower fares.

“The prices of everything else like food have stayed the same, and I have to 
provide for my family,” he said.

Zebo, a trader from the southern city of Osh who exports goods to Tajikistan, 
said that the business she was in was very sensitive to fuel price changes, but 
that for the moment the truck drivers she used as transport had not lowered the 
fees they were asking.

“As I’m a wholesale trader and there are some prices I can’t increase, I’m in 
danger of making no profit at all,” she said, adding that some retailers might 
end up cutting corners by selling low-quality versions of goods but keeping 
prices where they were.

Analysts say there are numerous factors outside the government’s control that 
limit its ability to curb inflation by holding fuel prices down.

For one thing, global oil prices have risen as a result of the recent unrest in 
Egypt, which controls the Suez Canal, a major route used by tankers.

Askar Beshimov, who heads an economic forecasting unit called Future 
Projection, believes petrol prices in Kyrgyzstan can only go up because of the 
global oil market and because Russian domestic fuel prices have risen.

“I doubt Russia is going to sell to Kyrgyzstan for less than its domestic 
consumers are paying,” he said.

Another factor is that some private fuel traders in Kyrgyzstan have not passed 
on the price cuts to their customers. They argue that they are still selling 
stocks purchased when the high Russian export tariffs were still in place. But 
Bakay Junushev, director of iCap Investment, a financial services firm in 
Bishkek, suspects some traders are happy to exploit the price cut and pocket 
the difference.

If prices remain high, farmers like Sapar, from the Panfilov district of Chui 
region, say it will impact the food market.

“The sowing season begins soon and our outgoings will depend on fuel prices,” 
he said. "No one should be surprised if our market prices are high, since we’ll 
have to incorporate these costs into the price of our produce.”

Kyrgyzstan is entirely reliant on foreign imports of petroleum products, mainly 
from Russia but also from its neighbour Kazakstan. The government is therefore 
looking at options for buying from other countries as well. Late last year, 
deputy prime minister Babanov paid a visit to Azerbaijan, a major oil exporter.

According to Bazarbay Mambetov, who chairs the national Oil Traders’ 
Association, “We’re hoping deliveries of petroleum products from Azerbaijan... 
will start by the end of this year. Their prices will be lower because their 
export duties are lower.”

Asyl Osmonalieva is an IWPR-trained journalist in Kyrgyzstan. Additional 
reporting was provided by Nina Muzaffarova, an IWPR intern in Bishkek.

This article was produced jointly under two IWPR projects: Building Central 
Asian Human Rights Protection & Education Through the Media, funded by the 
European Commission; and the Human Rights Reporting, Confidence Building and 
Conflict Information Programme, funded by the Foreign Ministry of Norway. 

The contents of this article are the sole responsibility of IWPR and can in no 
way be taken to reflect the views of either the European Union or the Foreign 
Ministry of Norway.

**** http://iwpr.net/ **********************************************************

REPORTING CENTRAL ASIA provides the international community with a unique 
insiders' perspective on the region. Using our network of local journalists, 
the service publishes news and analysis from across Central Asia on a weekly 
basis.

The service forms part of IWPR's Central Asia Project based in Almaty, Bishkek, 
Tashkent and London, which supports media development and encourages better 
local and international understanding of the region.

IWPR's Reporting Central Asia is supported by the UK Community Fund. The 
service is published online in English and Russian. 

The opinions expressed in Reporting Central Asia are those of the authors and 
do not necessarily represent those of the publication or of IWPR.

REPORTING CENTRAL ASIA: Editor-in-Chief: Anthony Borden; Managing Editor: Yigal 
Chazan; Senior Editor and Acting Central Asia Director: John MacLeod; Central 
Asia Editor: Saule Mukhametrakhimova.

IWPR PROJECT DEVELOPMENT AND SUPPORT: Executive Director: Anthony Borden; Head 
of Programmes: Sam Compton.


**** http://iwpr.net/ **********************************************************

IWPR – Giving Voice, Driving Change

IWPR - Europe, 48 Gray’s Inn Road, London WC1X 8LT, UK
Tel: +44 20 7831 1030

IWPR – United States, 1325 G Street, NW, Suite 500, Washington, DC 20005, 
United States
Tel: +1 202 449 7717

1515 Broadway, 11th Floor, New York, New York 10036, United States
Tel: +1 212 520 3950

Stichting IWPR Nederland, Eisenhowerlaan 77 K, 2517 KK Den Haag, The Netherlands
Tel: +31 70 338 9016

For further details on this project and other information services and media 
programmes, go to: http://iwpr.net/

ISSN: 1477-7924 Copyright © 2009 The Institute for War & Peace Reporting 

**** http://iwpr.net/ **********************************************************




This electronic mail message and any attached files are intended solely for the 
named recipients and may contain confidential and proprietary business 
information of the Institute for War & Peace Reporting (IWPR) and its 
affiliates. If you are not the named addressee, you should not disseminate, 
distribute or copy this e-mail.

Institute for War & Peace Reporting. 48 Gray's Inn Road, London WC1X 8LT, UK. 
Registered with charitable status in the United Kingdom (charity reg. no: 
1027201, company reg. no: 2744185); the United States under IRS Section 
501(c)(3); and The Netherlands as a charitable foundation.

Reply via email to