Re: Anywhere near concensus?

2003-12-12 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
Done:http://cvs.apache.org/~ajack/repository/proposals/ I think of the group, I like repositoryFQDN/ best. For me, it is between that and group (oh yeah, I asked for that one. ;-) 'cos they are both of deterministic directory depth/layout. [BTW: If things get 'overloaded' we can do the

Re: Anywhere near concensus?

2003-12-11 Thread Adam R. B. Jack
IIRC, the repository structure used by Maven (http://www.ibiblio.org/maven/) has generated much discussion in the past, with the general concensus being that the flat structure: . didn't help artifact categorisation . made it difficult to navigate and locate artifacts Folk have resolved