Re: New lists in eyebrowse
On 10/08/2003, at 08:51, Noel J. Bergman wrote: I don't know of any reason for it to not be public, but I'm cc'ing the list. I also can't see a reason to keep the list private, so +1 from my side :) Cheers, Erik --- Noel
Re: Revival
On 23/10/2003, at 08:42, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is anyone interested in reviving this project? Although I won't be of any great help when it comes to Java specifics, I'll be lurking here and perhaps might be able to lend a hand when questions concerning our mirroring system crop up... Cheers, Erik
Re: Maven Repository @ Apache
On 06.11.2003, at 21:50, Leo Simons wrote: yes it does; IIRC the repository project is currently a president's committee that was charged with figuring out how to integrate jar files into the distribution layout. Could you please elaborate further on this? I couldn't find any reference to the repository list, neither in the board minutes nor in any of the foundation-relevant archives, except the following message on community@apache.org on 01/03/2003: Sam Ruby wrote: I'm in a just do it kind of mood. I just created a [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailing list. Noel is the initial moderator. If/when there is an infrastructure.apache.org set up, I'll move the list to there. (currently it is [EMAIL PROTECTED]). If there is significant dissent, or the list falls into disuse, I'll simply delete the list. - Sam Ruby Cheers, Erik
Re: adding jaxme jars
On 08.03.2004, at 23:20, Mark R. Diggory wrote: project pomVersion3/pomVersion groupIdapache-jaxme/groupId nameApache Jaxme/name currentVersion0.2/currentVersion organization nameApache Software Foundation/name The official name is 'The Apache Software Foundation', as incorporated within the State of Delaware. See http://apache.org/foundation/records/certificate.html. urlwww.apache.org/url /organization licenses license nameASL 2.0/name It's AL 2.0 not ASL 2.0 (Apache License not Apache Software License). urlhttp://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0/url /license /licenses /project Perhaps a bit pedantic but... :-) Cheers, Erik smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: Rsync From Address and Source changing.
On 21.09.2004, at 22:42, Mark R. Diggory wrote: Here are the email headers for the new rsync reporting address: Return-Path: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Received: from tribal.metalab.unc.edu (IDENT:[EMAIL PROTECTED] [152.2.210.122]) by hogshead.codehaus.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id i8LKXN331667 for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:33:24 -0500 Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 15:33:24 -0500 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-Id: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Synchronization report for Apache Software Foundation Okay, should be working again. I've added [EMAIL PROTECTED] to the allow list for [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cheers, Erik Btw, [EMAIL PROTECTED] is usually the preferred place for such requests... -Mark Mark R. Diggory wrote: Jason has taken over the management of the ibiblio rsync emails (he's standardized the rsync process for all organizations rsyncing content to ibiblio. Currently rsync logs are sent to the [EMAIL PROTECTED] list, but I I suspect the moderation is rejecting them? Can we have this adjusted again? thanks, -Mark -- Mark Diggory Open Source Software Developer Apache Jakarta Project http://jakarta.apache.org smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Re: moderation for repository@apache.org
On 06.01.2005, at 21:04, Brett Porter wrote: Hi, Is it possible that I can moderate the [EMAIL PROTECTED] mail list? We seem to be getting a lot of non-subscribers posting there (and crossposting to infra@), and I'd prefer to keep the discussion together on the other list by letting them through. Noel was the only one moderating repository@ and so I've just added you... Cheers, Erik (cc'ed repository@ too keep them in the loop) Thanks, Brett smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
