From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tim Anderson wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From the requirements at
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?ASFRepository/Requirements:
ASF Repository shall ... allow browsing and downloading of artifacts by
Tim Anderson wrote:
By implication - the README is not an artifact but a feature of a version.
Is that a reasonable conclusion?
Stephen.
Why make the distinction? I view everything a project deploys as an
artifact. Some artifacts will only be useful to end users (e.g,
README, LICENSE.txt
Woops - see small correction in line.
Stephen McConnell wrote:
Tim Anderson wrote:
By implication - the README is not an artifact but a feature of a
version.
Is that a reasonable conclusion?
Stephen.
Why make the distinction? I view everything a project deploys as an
artifact. Some artifacts
Tim Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/11/2003 10:53:47 AM:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From the requirements at
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?ASFRepository/Requirements:
ASF Repository shall ... allow browsing and downloading of
artifacts
Stephen McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/11/2003 10:58:09 AM:
By implication - the README is not an artifact but a feature of a
version.
Is that a reasonable conclusion?
I'd question the value of distributing a README as a single file.
In the maven world, we have a type called
Tim Anderson wrote:
From: Stephen McConnell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Woops - see small correction in line.
Stephen McConnell wrote:
Tim Anderson wrote:
By implication - the README is not an artifact but a feature of a
version.
Is that a reasonable conclusion?
Stephen.
http://repo.apache.org/apache/commons-logging/1.0.3/index.html
Clearly, this is only useful to users browsing the repository,
and therefore makes no sense to include the version information.
On index.html, wouldn't we discourage the use of this? Wouldn't we want the
HTTP server to do a
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 01:41, Tim Anderson wrote:
I have a few comments on the proposed URI Syntax, from
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?ASFRepository/URISyntax.
quote
Compromise URI
http://host/project/version/artifact-[version;].ext
For example
Where is Tim's Layout?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask Consulting
Blog: http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/
Pub Key:http://blogs.codehaus.org/people/dion/public-key.asc
Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/11/2003 06:22:51 PM:
Jason,
I think that Tim's ideas were pretty
http://nagoya.apache.org/eyebrowse/[EMAIL PROTECTED]ms
gNo=266
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, 9 November 2003 7:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Comments on URI Syntax
Where is Tim's Layout?
--
dIon Gillard, Multitask
On Sun, 2003-11-09 at 02:22, Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Jason,
I think that Tim's ideas were pretty well-thought out and reflect a workable
consensus. The changes you are making to his ideas, if I read the
correctly, are to mandate a couple of things that he did not rule out, but
permitted to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From the requirements at
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?ASFRepository/Requirements:
ASF Repository shall ... allow browsing and downloading of artifacts by
humans via normal
web browser.
Requiring a version to be part of the artifact file name when the
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From the requirements at
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?ASFRepository/Requirements:
ASF Repository shall ... allow browsing and downloading of artifacts by
humans via normal
web browser.
Requiring a version to be part of
Tim Anderson wrote:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From the requirements at
http://nagoya.apache.org/wiki/apachewiki.cgi?ASFRepository/Requirements:
ASF Repository shall ... allow browsing and downloading of artifacts by
humans via normal
web browser.
Requiring a version
14 matches
Mail list logo
