Noel J. Bergman wrote:
Seems to me
that there is limited utility to being able to parse the URI, and that the
real key is having meta-data with which to assemble it. But others don't
seem to agree with that view. They want to parse semantic information from
the URI.
The semantic information
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 19/11/2003 01:31:13 AM:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 15/11/2003 10:00:07
PM:
Tim Anderson wrote:
...
A tool can 'screen scrape' the redirected page, prompt the user
to accept the license and
Sent this to nicola directly by mistake. Nicola is your mail client
overwritting the reply-to?
--
jvz.
Jason van Zyl
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://tambora.zenplex.org
In short, man creates for himself a new religion of a rational
and technical order to justify his work and to be justified in it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...
I don't think a repository for distributing jars fits the requirements for
(i) or (ii), and may possibly break (iii).
And I don't think the ASF would like to agree to (vi).
Well, IIUC it's because it's a jar repo you are talking about. I'm
taking about downloading
I'm taking about downloading the whole thing from the sun site as
users manually do. So there is effectively no distribuition
difference.
You would have to pass through the license request to the user. It would be
a bad idea for the tool to pose as a user without requiring user approval of
