On Tuesday 11 January 2005 12:18, Russell Gold wrote:
Is there currently a policy for how long files are kept in the
repository? It seems to me that old versions are not kept very long at
ibiblio, if there are newer versions available.
I am not sure if you are talking about the Transit client
Hi gang,
On 05-01-2005 09:39, Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What relationship does the repository list have with Maven?
What relationship does Maven have with the repository list?
Ass Brett Porter has written, and I agree:
1) Maven PMC takes ownership for getting the
On Thursday 06 January 2005 09:21, Dain Sundstrom wrote:
How do you get around the problem that it is very difficult to get a
url handler installed? Does this library work only when it is
installed into the system class path?
That is corrrect.
The issue is in the java.net.URL handling, where
Ant is adding a task so that providers can plug into it, and Wagon can
continue to be used in Ant.
Absolutely - all I meant was that Wagon maintaining its own Ant task
was probably not necessary given that. Wagon can plugin in to that.
If we splinter implementations, the repository effort
Take the commons-jelly/ directories on ibiblio and place them in a
similar structure as an example.
org/apache/commons/jelly/commons-jelly/1.0/commons-jelly-1.0.jar[.md5|.asc], etc
org/apache/commons/jelly/commons-jelly-tags-ant/1.0/commons-jelly-1.0.jar
putting repository@ back on the list - gmail tends to drop lists
unless you reply to all (hope this is what you intended).
Seems a reasonable first step. However it seems a little fragile if a
project changes artifact names or splits an existing artifact. e.g. if
commons-jelly splits into
On Wed, 05 Jan 2005 09:39:28 +0100, Nicola Ken Barozzi
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2) Henk, myself (Maven PMC), Mark Diggory (if available), representative
from interested Apache projects PMC (most likely someone from Ant) get
together to sort out exactly what we think needs doing (we can use the
What about having an XML description of the contents of a repository?
Such a description could serve multiple purposes, it could be used to
enumerate known mirrors, it could be used to segment the namespace -
say we reach some agreement with Sun and all sun artifacts fall into a
namespace of
Brett Porter wrote:
...
What interests me WRT repository is that it's possible for Ant users to
install an antlib that makes Wagon usable in Ant, and for Eclipse and
Netbeans users to be able to integrate it nicely in their artifact
stuff. Depot had an Eclipse pluin BTW.
Can you elaborate on how
Tim O'Brien wrote:
From: Nicola Ken Barozzi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
This is something that is already present in the JJar[1] project.
Wouldn't it suffice to just tell the system in what
repository to look for to get a certain artifact?
Sure, you could do this, but then you get into the
IMO we should [make] the Maven artifact handling better
and used by all Apache and non-Apache projects.
Is Maven willing to provide suitable support for Ant to use it? I just want
to make sure that this is not the Maven repository, but is THE repository.
Tool-agnostic.
--- Noel
On Wed, 5 Jan 2005 14:24:13 -0500, Noel J. Bergman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is Maven willing to provide suitable support for Ant to use it? I just want
to make sure that this is not the Maven repository, but is THE repository.
Tool-agnostic.
Yes - I've already discussed this and Steve and
12 matches
Mail list logo