RE: Synchronization report for Apache Software Foundation

2005-02-07 Thread Carlos Sanchez
4:41 PM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: RE: Synchronization report for Apache Software Foundation > > Ok, I'll take a look ASAP. > > > -Original Message- > > From: Mark R. Diggory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 09

Re: Synchronization report for Apache Software Foundation

2005-02-07 Thread Brett Porter
> +1 to only email when a change. I'm sure Carlos will get to it soon. Sorry for the noise. > Unsure why, but I'm not seeing a To: address for it in gmail, just a > Reply-To:. My guess is that the recipients are all BCC'd. Most mail clients say something like "To: Undisclosed recipients". This

Re: Synchronization report for Apache Software Foundation

2005-02-07 Thread Henri Yandell
> From: Mark R. Diggory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 09:09:03 -0600 > > Subject: Re: Synchronization report for Apache Software Foundation > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Yes, > > > > I'm hoping thoug

RE: Synchronization report for Apache Software Foundation

2005-02-06 Thread Carlos Sanchez
Ok, I'll take a look ASAP. > -Original Message- > From: Mark R. Diggory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 09:09:03 -0600 > Subject: Re: Synchronization report for Apache Software Foundation > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > >

Re: Synchronization report for Apache Software Foundation

2005-02-06 Thread Mark R. Diggory
x27;t this the right place? Cheers Carlos Sanchez -Original Message- From: Niclas Hedhman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Sun, 6 Feb 2005 22:39:09 +0800 Subject: Re: Synchronization report for Apache Software Foundation To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Sunday 06 February 20

RE: Synchronization report for Apache Software Foundation

2005-02-06 Thread Carlos Sanchez
Synchronization report for Apache Software Foundation > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > On Sunday 06 February 2005 20:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > mesg: ttyname: Operation not supported receiving file list ... done > > wrote 16 bytes

Re: Synchronization report for Apache Software Foundation

2005-02-06 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Sunday 06 February 2005 20:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > mesg: ttyname: Operation not supported > receiving file list ... done > wrote 16 bytes read 128048 bytes 2640.49 bytes/sec > total size is 428414805 speedup is 3345.32 > > > You can view the syncronization reports for today here: > > h

Re: Synchronization report for Apache Software Foundation

2005-02-06 Thread Dion Gillard
Are these supposed to contain any useful information? On Sun, 06 Feb 2005 00:46:54 -0800 (PST), [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > mesg: ttyname: Operation not supported > receiving file list ... done > wrote 16 bytes read 128048 bytes 36589.71 bytes/sec > total size is 428414805 s

Re: Synchronization report for Apache Software Foundation

2004-11-21 Thread Mark R. Diggory
Jason, What is the status of the rsync reporting via email? This is the first time we've actually received an email at [EMAIL PROTECTED] It appears to be caused by a file IO error involved with creating a directory that already exists? -Mark wrote: mesg: ttyname: Operation not supported receiv