[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>Nick Chalko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/03/2003 05:09:50 AM:
>
>
>
>>A somewhat standard layout is the important part.
>>
>>If we are changing current practice I think
>>
>>project/[subproject]/version/(jar|zip|gz|docs|liscenses)
>>is very good.
>>
>>
>
>Sub project i
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Nick Chalko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 01/03/2003 05:09:50 AM:
A somewhat standard layout is the important part.
If we are changing current practice I think
project/[subproject]/version/(jar|zip|gz|docs|liscenses)
is very good.
Sub project is, IMHO, way too fragi
Costin Manolache wrote:
On 1 Mar 2003, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 11:12, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is also redundant information - each jar has a well-defined Manifest
that should include version.
But I agree - re
Costin Manolache wrote:
On 1 Mar 2003, Jason van Zyl wrote:
On Sat, 2003-03-01 at 11:12, Costin Manolache wrote:
On Sat, 1 Mar 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is also redundant information - each jar has a well-defined Manifest
that should include version.
But I agree - re
