Hello,
I'm trying to make use of the new-in-1.1 accept view predicate to
register several views with the same name for the same context object to
render a response in the content-type requested by the user but the
result is not quite what I expect. The zcml looks like this:
view
2009/11/25 Alberto Valverde albe...@toscat.net:
Everything works fine when I request the application/json and
application/json+xconfig mimetypes with a xhr since I can control the
Accept header, however, when a browser makes a normal request the result
is unpredictable (in practice) since '*/*
Alberto Valverde wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to make use of the new-in-1.1 accept view predicate to
register several views with the same name for the same context object to
render a response in the content-type requested by the user but the
result is not quite what I expect. The zcml looks
Tim Hoffman wrote:
Hi Chris
I am trying to register some views directly through python and not
using the view decorator,
I have tried using code very similiar to repoze.bfg.testing.
However after doing so, whilst I can look the view up by doing
a
Hi Chris
Yeah I figured I as getting the wrong registry, and in fact I was if I
try and register stuff too early it all went in to the wrong bucket.
I am still having some problems looking stuff up. I can manually look
stuff up with
Alberto Valverde wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to make use of the new-in-1.1 accept view predicate to
register several views with the same name for the same context object to
render a response in the content-type requested by the user but the
result is not quite what I expect. The zcml looks
