Re: [Repoze-dev] Repackaged PIL 1.1.7
Chris Withers wrote:
You would be wrong, as you would know if you had tried running the
effbot's packages inside an eggified environment: he is actively
hostile to changes which would make this all go away, which leaves us
with the necessity of forking his release.
I don't believe this to be the case, so I dropped Fred a mail.
Here's his response:
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
Hi Chris, thanks for the heads up.
Not sure what's going on here; PIL is traditionally installed in
site-packages/PIL so that everything is available as from PIL import
..., but with a pth file that adds that directory to the path so that
pre-package code still works (there are tons of such code out there).
It looks like the setup.py file achieves this as follows:
extra_path = PIL,
package_dir={: PIL},
packages=[],
where extra_path creates the pth file, and the package_dir stuff makes
sure distutils installs things under PIL and not PIL/PIL. Some quick
Googling indicates that setuptools' support for extra_path is spotty
(non-existent until 2006, limited since then), so maybe this is the
issue?
Could you persuade whoever's ranting about this to jump over to
image-sig and propose a patch that fixes whatever problem Plone is
having but preserves the old behaviour?
Is such a patch possible? If so, could someone do as Fred asks and do so
while resisting the temptation to be rude and further alienate the
maintainer of what is a fantastic package? (yeah, I know, rich coming
from me...)
cheers,
Chris
--
Simplistix - Content Management, Batch Processing Python Consulting
- http://www.simplistix.co.uk
___
Repoze-dev mailing list
Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org
http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
Re: [Repoze-dev] urlparse patch for repoze.zodbconn
Apologies, the patch was the wrong way round zodbconn_urlparse.patch Description: Binary data On 26 Apr 2010, at 18:35, Fergus Doyle wrote: Hi, A patch for the newly introduced (in python 2.6.5) alternative incompatibility between urlparse and zeo:// urls Cheers, Fergus zodbconn_urlparse .patch___ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev ___ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
Re: [Repoze-dev] urlparse patch for repoze.zodbconn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Fergus Doyle wrote: Apologies, the patch was the wrong way round Thanks for the patch! Now released in repoze.zodbconn 0.11: http://pypi.python.org/pypi/repoze.zodbconn/0.11 Tres. - -- === Tres Seaver +1 540-429-0999 tsea...@palladion.com Palladion Software Excellence by Designhttp://palladion.com -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkvV2IYACgkQ+gerLs4ltQ5+qQCfUQXJbLXbGCpc4tH3/+8w130f rIAAoIYIHrWk6Nwu8BYfKXMeR/DnuYlX =Nour -END PGP SIGNATURE- ___ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
Re: [Repoze-dev] Repackaged PIL 1.1.7
On 2010-04-26, Chris Withers ch...@simplistix.co.uk wrote:
I don't believe this to be the case, so I dropped Fred a mail.
Here's his response:
Fredrik Lundh wrote:
Hi Chris, thanks for the heads up.
Not sure what's going on here; PIL is traditionally installed in
site-packages/PIL so that everything is available as from PIL import
..., but with a pth file that adds that directory to the path so that
pre-package code still works (there are tons of such code out there).
It looks like the setup.py file achieves this as follows:
extra_path = PIL,
package_dir={: PIL},
packages=[],
where extra_path creates the pth file, and the package_dir stuff makes
sure distutils installs things under PIL and not PIL/PIL. Some quick
Googling indicates that setuptools' support for extra_path is spotty
(non-existent until 2006, limited since then), so maybe this is the
issue?
Could you persuade whoever's ranting about this to jump over to
image-sig and propose a patch that fixes whatever problem Plone is
having but preserves the old behaviour?
Is such a patch possible? If so, could someone do as Fred asks and do so
while resisting the temptation to be rude and further alienate the
maintainer of what is a fantastic package? (yeah, I know, rich coming
from me...)
Wow! Thanks Chris. That sounds like something we can work with. Not to speak
for Hanno, but maybe Hanno could provide such a patch ;-)
cheers,
Chris
--
Alex Clark · http://aclark.net
Author of Plone 3.3 Site Administration · http://aclark.net/plone-site-admin
___
Repoze-dev mailing list
Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org
http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
[Repoze-dev] LMS a BFG application
Hi We would like to share with you, an application we have developed using Repoze.BFG and KARL as basis. We want to contribute this project for Open Source Community. The application, is named as *LMS*( Leave management System ). We wish , LMS can act as a reference , for any one who is interested in learning KARL based repoze applications. You can download, source code from : https://sourceforge.net/projects/mahiti-lms Please feel free to tell us how it is and our lackings if any. -- Thanks Regards, Srikanth.T Mahiti Infotech Pvt. Ltd. # 33-34, 2nd Floor, Hennur Cross, Hennur Road, Bangalore, India - 560043 Phone: +91 80 4115 0580/1 ___ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
