2009/4/27 Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com:
chameleon.genshi still depends on lxml. Currently BFG has c.genshi support,
but
when we move to the new chameleon version, we'll need to package
chameleon.genshi support outside bfg itself in an add-on package (which will
still depend on lxml).
Hello,
Today I took some time to review the state of affairs for checking for
what used to be identity in TG1.
A little reminder of the API
http://docs.turbogears.org/1.0/UsingIdentity#using-identity-in-templates
IMO that api was really good as tg.identity (the template variable)
was a simple
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Malthe Borch mbo...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/27 Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.comoptilude%2bli...@gmail.com
:
I've never once written a web app that didn't need templating, because
I've never written one that only responds with text/plain and writing
On Apr 27, 2009, at 1:40 PM, Chris Rossi wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 1:37 PM, Malthe Borch mbo...@gmail.com
wrote:
2009/4/27 Martin Aspeli optilude+li...@gmail.com:
I've never once written a web app that didn't need templating,
because
I've never written one that only responds with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Reed O'Brien wrote:
On Apr 27, 2009, at 1:46 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
On 4/27/09 1:42 PM, Paul Everitt
In response to the original question, it seems that everyone is on
board with factoring out genshi and xslt to add-on packages and
leaving
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris McDonough wrote:
On 4/27/09 1:28 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
But anyway, yeah. For someone who has never used zope.component, though,
it's
really not that important (more strictly compares to zope.component).
Reading
On 4/27/09 2:12 PM, Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Chris McDonough wrote:
On 4/27/09 1:28 PM, Martin Aspeli wrote:
Chris McDonough wrote:
But anyway, yeah. For someone who has never used zope.component, though,
it's
really not that important (more
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Malthe Borch wrote:
2009/4/27 Tres Seaver tsea...@palladion.com:
I can't see much reason for us to try to share code with people who
won't even attempt a rational evaluation of the candidate. -1 to
bikeshedding this thing further; +1 to an 'svn
I think its nice to have a
default...
...but I think one default is enough ;)
+1
Tres Seaver wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Reed O'Brien wrote:
On Apr 27, 2009, at 1:46 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
On 4/27/09 1:42 PM, Paul Everitt
On 4/27/09 1:18 PM, Chris McDonough wrote:
I find the introduction lacking; why do I care about indirection,
what's the benefit.
Good point.
Um. Why *do* we care about indirection? In particular, why do we care about
this sort of generic-function-ish dispatch pattern we call adaptation?
Previously Malthe Borch wrote:
2009/4/27 Reed O'Brien r...@reedobrien.com:
+0 I think it is OK to have a default one. Think hello world.
Devil's advocate here, but:
print htmlbodyHello world/body/html
You kind of don't need a templating language; in particular, you might
want to
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Wichert Akkerman wich...@wiggy.net wrote:
Previously Malthe Borch wrote:
2009/4/27 Reed O'Brien r...@reedobrien.com:
+0 I think it is OK to have a default one. Think hello world.
Devil's advocate here, but:
print htmlbodyHello world/body/html
Hey,
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 6:19 AM, Malthe Borch mbo...@gmail.com wrote:
I realize this documentation[1] is still in progress; yet, here are
some comments, posted to the list to maybe encourage some kind of
debate (since it's likely that there will be several consumers of this
package in
Sorry. Just pretend like it really did end there. ;)
Chris
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 8:20 PM, Martin Aspeli
optilude+li...@gmail.comoptilude%2bli...@gmail.com
wrote:
Tres Seaver wrote:
Amen. Or should that be So say we all! :)
Not any longer... (sniff)
Martin
--
Author of
14 matches
Mail list logo
