2009/5/4 Carlos de la Guardia carlos.delaguar...@gmail.com:
If Malthe or anyone else has a good idea about how to do this and will give
me some pointers, I'm willing to use my limited abilities to make this work.
Otherwise, I might try to bring in old zpt.
It can be done, but it requires the
On 5/4/09 1:21 AM, Iain Duncan wrote:
Hi folks, I'm new here and was wondering if there is a good Repoze.bfg
to Grok comparison page anywhere. If not, I'd like to recommend that it
would be a great addition to the docs. I know there is a brief
comparison up there, but to someone like me who is
On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 02:14:02PM -0400, Chris McDonough wrote:
...
I have no plans to chase a ZPT-on-GAE ball around the yard personally. But I
might go ahead and create BFG bindings for plain old Genshi (as opposed to
chameleon.genshi). Plain-old-Genshi seems to be supported on GAE.. or
New submission from Jacob Singh jacobsi...@gmail.com:
While repoze.profiler seems to be 2.4 compat with the try...except in the
import, pyprof2calltree seems to not be. Here is the trace:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File /usr/local/solrflare/bin/gate2.py, line 129, in ?
main()
Hanno Schlichting hanno...@hannosch.eu added the comment:
Since I added that particular dependency I should take care of this issue. Only
question I have:
Do we really still care about Python 2.4 support? Especially for profiling the
2.5 libraries are quite
different and much better.
Iain Duncan wrote:
Hi folks, I'm new here and was wondering if there is a good Repoze.bfg
to Grok comparison page anywhere. If not, I'd like to recommend that it
would be a great addition to the docs. I know there is a brief
comparison up there, but to someone like me who is experienced in
On Mon, 2009-05-04 at 17:45 +0200, Martijn Faassen wrote:
Hey,
Chris McDonough wrote:
On 5/4/09 1:21 AM, Iain Duncan wrote:
Hi folks, I'm new here and was wondering if there is a good Repoze.bfg
to Grok comparison page anywhere. If not, I'd like to recommend that it
would be a great
Hi
I am new to the list (and pretty new to repoze) I have put together a
module which includes bindings for zope.pagetemplate with direct
support for metal macros, plus a bunch of helper utils that make
things a bit easier when using google app engine,
I was thinking of calling it repoze.gae.
A
Hi Tim,
Carlos de la Guardia created zope.pagetemplate bindings for bfg the other day
(http://svn.repoze.org/repoze.bfg.zopepagetemplate/trunk/). I might try to
change that if it doesn't have what you need to get ZPT support, and then, if
necessary, create another package that has the other
HI Chris
Sounds like a plan
I will start a repoze.bfg.gae
My bindings for pagetemplate are pretty much the same, but I have a
higher level
wrapper that is doing some extra stuff for macros etc
So I may leave that zpt wrapper repoze.bfg.gae as I plan to do some
template caching that is
I still use it with 2.4 (or at least I have in the past, not lately). It'd
kinda suck to not be able to profile our old apps that require 2.4.
On 5/4/09 1:37 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote:
Hanno Schlichtinghanno...@hannosch.eu added the comment:
Since I added that particular dependency I
Chris McDonough chr...@plope.com added the comment:
I still use it with 2.4 (or at least I have in the past, not lately). It'd
kinda suck to not be able to profile our old apps that require 2.4.
__
Repoze Bugs b...@bugs.repoze.org
http://bugs.repoze.org/issue72
12 matches
Mail list logo
