[Repoze-dev] repoze.bfg.xmlrpc - httpserver hangs

2009-09-09 Thread simahawk
hi list, I created a web-service with repoze.bfg and repoze.bfg.xmlrpc with a xmlrpx_view. This views creates a PDF and it should return me a simple string with the url of the PDF but in order to get my string back I need to restart repoze 'cause the application hangs at some point after the view

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.bfg.xmlrpc - httpserver hangs

2009-09-09 Thread simahawk
On Wed, 2009-09-09 at 11:44 -0400, Chris McDonough wrote: > simahawk wrote: > > hi list, > > > > I created a web-service with repoze.bfg and repoze.bfg.xmlrpc with a > > xmlrpx_view. This views creates a PDF and it should return me a simple > > string with the u

Re: [Repoze-dev] Fwd: repoze.bfg.xmlrpc - httpserver hangs

2009-09-10 Thread simahawk
der paste you get the same > thing, whereas if you use twisted > it works fine. See this thread I posted last year. > > https://mail.zope.org/pipermail/zope3-users/2008-October/008261.html > > T > > On Wed, Sep 9, 2009 at 11:32 PM, simahawk wrote: > > hi list, >

Re: [Repoze-dev] Fwd: repoze.bfg.xmlrpc - httpserver hangs

2009-09-10 Thread simahawk
ads debug middleware you put up at > http://pastebin.org/16704 looks more or less normal to me. You might > try a different WSGI HTTP server to see if that has any effect. > > - C > > simahawk wrote: > > Thank you Tim! > > > > It seems the only thing I c

[Repoze-dev] repoze +buildout + openoffice

2009-09-11 Thread simahawk
hi, I'm trying to install repoze and openoffice w/ the buildout but when running bin/buildout I get: While: Installing. Getting section openoffice. Initializing section openoffice. Installing recipe z3c.recipe.openoffice. Getting distribution for 'z3c.recipe.openoffice'. Error: Cou

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze +buildout + openoffice

2009-09-14 Thread simahawk
to override the index. Just add additional > find-links. But I may have missed something here, and welcome further > comments. > > > BEst, > --r. > On Sep 13, 2009, at 10:32 PM, Sebastien Douche wrote: > > > On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 17:46, simahawk wrote: > > &