I still use it with 2.4 (or at least I have in the past, not lately). It'd kinda suck to not be able to profile our old apps that require 2.4.
On 5/4/09 1:37 PM, Hanno Schlichting wrote: > Hanno Schlichting<hanno...@hannosch.eu> added the comment: > > Since I added that particular dependency I should take care of this issue. > Only question I have: > Do we really still care about Python 2.4 support? Especially for profiling > the 2.5 libraries are quite > different and much better. Personally I'd just call 2.4 unsupported for this > package. > > ---------- > assignedto: -> hannosch > nosy: +hannosch > status: unread -> in-progress > > __________________________________ > Repoze Bugs<b...@bugs.repoze.org> > <http://bugs.repoze.org/issue72> > __________________________________ > _______________________________________________ > Repoze-dev mailing list > Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org > http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev > _______________________________________________ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
