Hello, Chris. Because you're using the quickstart plugin, you can set "permission_class" to None and everything should work. See: http://what.repoze.org/docs/plugins/quickstart/#repoze.what.plugins.quickstart.setup_sql_auth
HTH, - Gustavo. Chris said: > I'm using repoze.what, repoze.who and repoze.what.plugins.quickstart in a > pylons application. However, in order to load any page, it has to make a > SQL call with two joins in it (since Users to Groups is an N to M > relation). I don't need that much flexibility and could get away with a > setup where each user is only a member of one group, making for a much > simpler relation. If I change the SQLAlchemy model to reflect this, with > the repoze.* middleware "just work"? And more importantly, will it work > correctly without any negative consequences? > > Ideally, what I want is a static set of groups and don't need the > permissions aspect. I really only need a dynamic set of users in the DB (so > group could even be a column of the Users table). Would it be better to go > a different route than the repoze.* authorization frameworks or can they be > bent to work in this way? -- Gustavo Narea <xri://=Gustavo>. | Tech blog: =Gustavo/(+blog)/tech ~ About me: =Gustavo/about | _______________________________________________ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
