2009/6/3 Chris Rossi <ch...@archimedeanco.com>: > Just read over the repoze.curry docs--looks really cool!
Thanks :-) > I was glad to see at the end that you had a "static" decorator on the to-do > list. I had thought of that while reading your docs and was going to > suggest it anyway. I was wondering, though, if "const" might be a better > name for it. Marking a function as "const" would be morally equivalent to a > C++ function with all of its arguments declared const. (key difference, of > course, that C++ compiler actually enforces this.) static generally implies > something different in most languages that use it. You may be right; ``const`` could be a better term. I'm not too much into the lingo of computer languages at large. \malthe _______________________________________________ Repoze-dev mailing list Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
