Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.who release

2010-08-20 Thread Chris McDonough 
The main thing preventing r.who 2.0 from having a non-alpha release is
documentation.  It'd likely be safe to use it in production, but it'd be
safer to use 1.0.X, in case we wind up changing the API as the result of
finding design bugs when writing those docs.

On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 14:08 -0400, David Schein wrote:
> Hey, folks.  I am using repoze.who and wondering what release is
> recommended for production deployment.  I am using 2.0a2 and the "a2"
> makes me wonder.
> 
> Thanks much.
> 
> Peace,
> David S.
> ___
> Repoze-dev mailing list
> Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org
> http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev
> 


___
Repoze-dev mailing list
Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org
http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.who release

2010-08-20 Thread Shane Hathaway 
On 08/20/2010 12:08 PM, David Schein wrote:
> Hey, folks.  I am using repoze.who and wondering what release is
> recommended for production deployment.  I am using 2.0a2 and the "a2"
> makes me wonder.

I'm using 1.0.18.  It works fine as far as I can tell.

Shane
___
Repoze-dev mailing list
Repoze-dev@lists.repoze.org
http://lists.repoze.org/listinfo/repoze-dev