awesome, thanks!
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:32 AM, Wichert Akkerman wrote:
> On 4/21/10 11:23 , Chris McDonough wrote:
> > The spelling:
> >
> >
> >
> > Is syntactic candy that can also be spelled like this:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > So you can probably do this:
> >
> >
> >
> >
On 4/21/10 11:23 , Chris McDonough wrote:
> The spelling:
>
>
>
> Is syntactic candy that can also be spelled like this:
>
>
>
>
> So you can probably do this:
>
>
>
> wrapper="some-other-view"/>
> name="some-other-view"/>
>
> I haven't tried this, but I
The spelling:
Is syntactic candy that can also be spelled like this:
So you can probably do this:
I haven't tried this, but I'm pretty sure it will work.
On 4/21/10 2:05 AM, Iain Duncan wrote:
> Is there any chance of having wrapped views work on views declared with
