On Thu, 2022-06-09 at 13:25 +0200, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> Oh, interesting. TIL.
The docs are relatively new, at one point we had a few folks who had
never contributed to Debian show up wanting to convert their company's
internal port of Debian for their company's CPU arch into an official
On Thu, Jun 09, 2022 at 07:16:07PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> Repro-builds is in the official port section, after the step
> of converting from unofficial to official and before the step of
> applying to become a released port.
Oh, interesting. TIL.
> Since repro builds […] is a blocker for
On Thu, 2022-06-09 at 11:00 +0100, Chris Lamb wrote:
> For some unknown reason, I thought that riscv64 *was* an official
> Debian architecture, and the tone of my previous emails should be
> read with that (incorrect) assumption in mind.
riscv64 is in the process of becoming an official port and
Holger Levsen wrote:
> while this is not wrong, testing risc-v on is currently not really sensible
> for us as risc-v is not a Debian architecture yet.
For some unknown reason, I thought that riscv64 *was* an official Debian
architecture, and the tone of my previous emails should be read with
