Re: Bug#1030785: Reproducibility of ocaml...

2023-02-07 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hi Chris, Le 07/02/2023 à 17:13, Chris Lamb a écrit : I appreciate this info is difficult to find (!), but for a bunch of historical reasons, there are actually a different set of variations tested when we test sid compared to when we test bookworm. In other words, the differences between the

Re: -ffile-prefix-map option and reproducibility

2023-02-07 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Tue, Feb 07, 2023 at 04:41:47PM +0100, Stéphane Glondu wrote: > When building packages, a -ffile-prefix-map option is automatically injected > into CFLAGS. Where does it come from? Since when? > > I suspect this was added to improve reproducibility. Ironically, it makes > packages that capture

Re: Reproducibility of ocaml...

2023-02-07 Thread Chris Lamb
Hi Stéphane, > Looking at [3], it seems only unstable is affected. Are you aware of a > change that could explain that? In particular, I don't understand why > the bookworm version is reported as reproducible whereas the version is > the same as unstable. I appreciate this info is difficult

Reproducibility of ocaml...

2023-02-07 Thread Stéphane Glondu
Hi, I just discovered a reproducibility issue [1,2] in ocaml, which can have dire consequences. Looking at [3], it seems only unstable is affected. Are you aware of a change that could explain that? In particular, I don't understand why the bookworm version is reported as reproducible