Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> On 2024-04-16, Chris Lamb wrote:
>> However, I think this first iteration of --hard-timeout time has a few
>> things that would need ironing out first, and potentially make it not
>> worth implementing:
>>
>> (1) You suggest it should
n tests.r-b.org manually
first and see how that goes? I'm not 100% against the idea of
implementing this in diffoscope eventually, but it would make a lot of
sense to try out the "manual" version first and gain some real-world
experi
as, by doing it outside of diffoscope at the level of the
Jenkins. As in, exactly what you describe here:
> Else we could also extend the current code for tests.r-b.o/debian,
> which currently
> just kills diffoscope after 2h, to then run diffoscope
> --max-container-depth 3 :)
Is that a massi
n packages were added, 38 were
updated and 23 were removed this month adding to ever-growing knowledge
about identified issues [32]. As part of this effort, a number of issue
types were updated, including Chris Lamb adding a new
ocaml_include_directories toolchain issue [33] and James Addison addin
Fay Stegerman wrote:
> https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/-/merge_requests/140
Nice; I have applied this locally in Git and will release shortly. :)
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org chris-lamb.co
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for March's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed.
If possible, please share the following link:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2024-03/
.. and also consider retweeting:
ht
issue.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/m
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
pe 263 will be used to compare the
two builds:
From https://gist.github.com/lamby/e5db96d4d61612485a469b826590192e/raw
(saved output for posterity)
Will loop Fay in via Salsa presently.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org chris-lamb
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-list
,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
://www.sphinx-doc.org/en/master/
Elsewhere, Bernhard M. Wiedemann posted another monthly update [41] for
his work elsewhere in openSUSE.
[41]
https://lists.opensuse.org/archives/list/fact...@lists.opensuse.org/thread/I66U56F5R3TR4ZTLYGPSGWINNOLZ7XP4/
§
diffoscope
-
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for February's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed.
If possible, please share the following link:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2024-02/
.. and also consider retweeting:
ht
y do not have access to the above repository, you can request access
by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬠⬠Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org ð
tags 1064973 + pending
thanks
Ah, I see the issue now; its to do with empty pyc files. Now
properly fixed in Git, pending upload:
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/commit/c885c24ad4807a0ec20c0cca9572b395812c85d9
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
ng the traceback.
Can you run diffoscope --debug so we can see which .pyc file is the
offending one? I think it is "environment.cpython-312.pyc", but it
would be great to get confirmation. Also knowing your exact Python
version (using python3 --version) would be useful withal.
Best wishes
,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
ttps://lists.reproducible-builds.org/pipermail/rb-general/2024-January/003232.html
[13] https://github.com/kpcyrd/archlinux-userland-fs-cmp
[14] https://asciinema.org/a/MFefYEdvU2O5LlIzseQnyBky5
§
Issues with our SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH code?
--
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for January's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed. We didn't
know what to do with the FOSDEM stuff (technically February, not January
so I will do a separate post tomorrow).
Anyway, please sh
y do not have access to the above repository, you can request access
by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Best wishes,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
E Software "Best Paper" award
-
In February 2022, we announced in these reports [2] that a paper written
by Chris Lamb [3] and Stefano Zacchiroli [4] was now available in the
March/April 2022 issue of IEEE Software [5].
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for December's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed.
If possible, please share the following link:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2023-12/
.. and also consider retweeting:
ht
access to the above repository, you can request access
by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
___
m/
[41] https://github.com/drupol
[42]
https://github.com/drupol/ipc2023/releases/tag/v23-79efbb4c24ab0d42c73906d16233a79d9659c5ca
§§§
## diffoscope changes
diffoscope [43] is our in-depth and content-aware diff utility that
can locate and diagnose reproducibility issues. This month, Chris
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for November's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed.
If possible, please share the following link:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2023-11/
.. and also consider retweeting:
ht
If you
currently do not have access to the above repository, you can request access
by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Best wishes,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
can be closed.
Best wishes,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
hat a stack traceback can be printed, in case a
> run-away program was the cause.
>
> — https://docs.python.org/2/library/exceptions.html#exceptions.MemoryError
... so this may not work in all situations.
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-
rror
Yes, diffoscope is running out of memory and this may indeed be a bug
in diffoscope. However, how much RAM is diffoscope allowed (or can)
use?
Best wishes,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
_
Am I?)
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listi
qemu [77] (date and Sphinx issue)
* qpid [78] (sorting problem)
* rakudo [79] (filesystem ordering issue)
* SLOF [80] (date-related issue)
* spack [81] (CPU counting issue)
* xemacs-packages [82] (date-related issue)
* Chris Lamb:
* #1053353 [83] filed against dacite [84].
* #
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for October's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed.
If possible, please share the following link:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2023-10/
.. and also consider retweeting:
ht
access to the above repository, you can request access
by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
___
s/gcc/Debugging-Options.html#index-fdebug-prefix-map
Let's hope it solves reproducibility in this package. And, if it does,
that would certainly "solve" the diffoscope timeout issue.
Best wishes,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-build
s there
have not been meaningful changes that might cause crashes or
timeouts.)
c) An issue in some tool or utility that diffoscope calls.
d) Some other issue.
However, Holger will likely have the most up-to-date information on
this, even if that is "I have no new information :-("
-
this bug wasn't closed… so closing it now in BCC. :)
Thanks to you both.
Best wishes,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-buil
rer, scheme?)
Best wishes,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for September's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed.
If possible, please share the following link:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2023-09/
.. and also consider re-tweeting:
ht
access to the above repository, you can request access
by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
___
treat unknown file types as text if
they have a MIME type of text/plain. This avoids the use of hexdump
with the examples you sent over at least.
Do you think I should be further limiting that conditional to a
whitelist of safe encodings, too? (eg. "utf-8" and "us-ascii", etc.)
R
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for August's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed.
If possible, please share the following link:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2023-08/
.. and also consider retweeting:
ht
access to the above repository, you can request access
by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
___
FC Stegerman wrote:
> You're passing --version as a non-option argument:
>
> diffoscope -- --version
>
> It worked (and was probably needed) before as the "--" was interpreted
> by schroot, not diffoscope.
Oh, bravo :)
--
,''`.
: :' : Ch
the schroot?
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
s up to? (the child process
tree? strace?)
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-b
access to the above repository, you can request access
by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬠⬠Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org ð
2
I'll followup to the second bug presently.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for June's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed.
If possible, please share the following link:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2023-06/
.. and also consider retweeting:
ht
access to the above repository, you can request access
by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
___
) in bookworm means that they can still vary.
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-li
forwarded 1037075
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/-/issues/342
thanks
I've forwarded this "upstream" here:
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/-/issues/342
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for May's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed. If
you have a moment, please share the following link:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2023-05/
… and also consider retweeting:
ht
access to the above repository, you can request access
by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
___
Reprodu
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for April's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed.
If possible, please share the following link:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2023-04/
.. and also consider retweeting:
ht
prior to publishing,
though. If you currently do not have access to the above repository,
you can request access by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Best wishes,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
forwarded 1034504
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/-/issues/338
thanks
I've forwarded this 'upstream' here:
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/-/issues/338
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org
.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for March's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed.
If possible, please share the following link:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2023-03/
.. and also consider retweeting:
ht
access to the above repository, you can request access
by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬠⬠Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org ð
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for February's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed.
If possible, please share the following link:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2023-02/
.. and also consider retweeting:
ht
y do not have access to the above repository, you can request access
by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬠⬠Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org ð
or…?
Best wishes,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for January's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed.
If possible, please share the following link:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2023-01/
.. and also consider retweeting:
ht
access to the above repository,
you can request access by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
___
Hi all,
> […]
As Mattia writes on the Salsa bug [0], I now don't think this is a
network issue. In other words, the package FTBFS regardless of whether
you have network access or not.
To make debugging this easier, I've split out the inline Python code
in c341b63a [1], and simply running the
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for December's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed.
If possible, please share the following link:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2022-12/
.. and also consider retweeting:
ht
access to the above repository, you can request access
by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
___
tags 1026982 + pending
thanks
Fixed in Git, although I made it helpful on other distros as well:
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/commit/85bf76f0deb398a89512a4675cfc3be8d4511902
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org
l remain… as would the desire to discriminate
between pyzip files and other ZIP files with prepended data.
Could another — different — string be emitted in the case that these
prepended bytes are a shebang? We could potentially look for the file
starting with #! and for that to take precedence
ement.
Thanks very much for this; I've gone ahead and committed a fix for
this here:
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/commit/44ebd188adad543ba2a5bd81ed5a7e6436b36784
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debia
d see you at the next one!
Best wishes,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.d
reassign 1026520 python-rstr
merge 1026569 1026520
affects 1026520 diffoscope
thanks
Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> During a rebuild of all packages in sid, your package failed to build
> on amd64.
Quite so. However, I think the problem is elsewhere:
>> File
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for November's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed.
If possible, please share the following link:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2022-11/
.. and also consider retweeting:
ht
y do not have access to the above repository, you can request access
by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> Since the previous sprints were fun and productive, I am planning on
> doing NMU sprints every Thursday in December (1st, 8th, 15th, 22nd,
> 29th).
I'll be there/then on the 8th, 22nd (maybe...) and the 29th. :)
Best wishes,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ C
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for October's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed.
If possible, please share the following link:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2022-10/
.. and, assuming Twitter hasn't *complet
Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> […]
> Oops! Thursday November 17th!
See you there/then!
Best wishes,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reprod
Hi Vagrant,
> […]
Can you clarify whether you meant *Wednesday* November 16th or
Thursday November *17th*? :)
Chris
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
___
Reproducible-builds mail
y do not have access to the above repository, you can request access
by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬠⬠Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org ð
.upload
> checkpw_1.02-1.2_source.ftp-master.upload
>
> And did the legwork that lead to a QA upload the following day:
>
> madlib_1.3.0-3_source.ftp-master.upload
Oh, neat work. :)
Best wishes,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o repr
16:00 UTC!
I enjoyed the sprint on October 6th and found it both fun and
productive; can we schedule another one...?
Best wishes,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
___
Reproducible-builds mail
tags 1022209 + pending
thanks
Fixed in Git, pending upload:
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/commit/d647eb7554e3bd51ab8fbe18fc84f885fce4f789
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
tags 1022146 + pending
thanks
Fixed in Git, pending upload:
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/commit/dbf5350fdacf5790ceab4f784ab8fc2f41cfa24c
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
tags 1022145 + pending
thanks
Fixed in Git, pending upload:
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/commit/727b3c9ea54b89465d2308997aa8b4bd25bff07f
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
forwarded 989626
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/-/issues/315
thanks
I've forwarded this upstream here:
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/-/issues/315
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org
forwarded 1022210
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/-/issues/319
thanks
I've forwarded this upstream here:
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/-/issues/319
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org
forwarded 1022209
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/-/issues/318
thanks
I've forwarded this upstream here:
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/-/issues/318
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org
forwarded 1022146
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/-/issues/317
thanks
I've forwarded this upstream here:
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/-/issues/317
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org
forwarded 1022145
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/-/issues/316
thanks
I've forwarded this upstream here:
https://salsa.debian.org/reproducible-builds/diffoscope/-/issues/316
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for September's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed.
If possible, please share the following link:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2022-09/
.. and also consider retweeting:
ht
lf? You can probably do
this better than I can as you have all of the context, after all...
Best wishes,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reprodu
y do not have access to the above repository, you can request access
by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬠⬠Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org ð
egards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@alioth-lists.debian.net
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
ed .buildinfo file
(except, of course, for the Build-Date field).
Hope this helps. Thanks, Helmut.
Regards,
--
,''`.
: :' : Chris Lamb
`. `'` la...@debian.org chris-lamb.co.uk
`-
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
R
gt; - was unable to reproduce the issue with two patches:
> #791423 linuxtv-dvb-apps: please make the build reproducible
> Marked as done
> #794398 clhep: please make the build reproducible
> Uncertain of status
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for August's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed.
If possible, please share the following link:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2022-08/
.. and also consider retweeting:
ht
access to the above repository, you can request access
by following the instructions at:
https://reproducible-builds.org/contribute/salsa/
Regards,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o o reproducible-builds.org
⬊ ⬋
o
___
in the upstream source whereas we use the debian packaged
> version of the library for delly. So infact there is no actual use of
> the embedded directory anywhere.
.oO( I wonder if this is worthy of a note in debian/README.source...? )
Best wishes,
--
o
⬋ ⬊ Chris Lamb
o
LDFLAGS += -lhts -lz -llzma -lbz2 -Wl,-rpath,${EBROOTHTSLIB}
endif
^^
As package maintainer though, you will probably have more insight into
this; it seems like your package is doing rather interesting things with
this htslib directory. :)
Hope this quick message helps put you on t
Chris Lamb wrote:
> Please review the draft for July's Reproducible Builds report:
This has now been published — thanks to all who contributed! If
possible, please share the following link:
https://reproducible-builds.org/reports/2022-07/
.. and also consider retweeting:
ht
1 - 100 of 568 matches
Mail list logo
