Re: [Reproducible-builds] Storing .deb checksums in ADMINDIR/status?

2015-06-23 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Tue 2015-06-23 03:31:05 -0400, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: Some people suggested that we should record a checksum of the `.deb` installed as a way to unambiguously referring to a specific package. The main benefit that I can think of is that it would allow to directly retrieve the file from

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#789728: aegisub: [PATCH] please make the build reproducible

2015-06-23 Thread Juan Picca
Package: aegisub Version: 3.1.2-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi! While working on the reproducible builds effort [1], we have noticed that aegisub could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes timestamps

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#789747: dipy: [PATCH] please make the build reproducible

2015-06-23 Thread Juan Picca
Package: dipy Version: 0.7.1-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi! While working on the reproducible builds effort [1], we have noticed that dipy could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes extra timestamps

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#789748: jansson: [PATCH] please make the build reproducible

2015-06-23 Thread Juan Picca
Package: jansson Version: 2.7-3 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi! While working on the reproducible builds effort [1], we have noticed that jansson could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes extra

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#789752: mathjax-docs: [PATCH] please make the build reproducible

2015-06-23 Thread Juan Picca
Package: mathjax-docs Version: 2.5+20150415-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi! While working on the reproducible builds effort [1], we have noticed that mathjax-docs could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#789648: apt-dater: please make the build reproducible

2015-06-23 Thread Ximin Luo
On 23/06/15 03:42, Dhole wrote: Source: apt-dater Version: 1.0.1+git20150119-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that apt-dater could not be

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#789751: python-pysaml2: [PATCH] please make the build reproducible

2015-06-23 Thread Juan Picca
Package: python-pysaml2 Version: 2.4.0-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi! While working on the reproducible builds effort [1], we have noticed that python-pysaml2 could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#789733: migrate: [PATCH] please make the build reproducible

2015-06-23 Thread Juan Picca
Package: migrate Version: 0.9.6-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi! While working on the reproducible builds effort [1], we have noticed that migrate could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes extra