On Thu, 2016-04-07 at 00:42 +0530, Satyam Zode wrote:
> Thank you for reviewing patch. I have made all the changes you
> mentioned above. Please find an attachment :-)
This will works better but will still give a crash when both symlinks
are broken and point to a filename of the same length; beca
Source: lua-ldoc
Version: 1.4.3-5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch upstream
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: toolchain
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/stevedonovan/LDoc/pull/233
Dear Maintainer,
While wor
Hi Reiner!
I did some trivial changes. Please find an attached patch.
This patch closes #818856 and #796262.
Thanks!
Satyam Zode
From 85c062d32b84ed6d8fcf5a80f0d2a2fbb4e43e54 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Satyam Zode
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 01:15:04 +0530
Subject: [PATCH] Fixed issue related to di
Hi Reiner!
Thank you for reviewing patch. I have made all the changes you
mentioned above. Please find an attachment :-)
Cheers,
Satyam Zode
From 2e440a527e4689a6f4321695801b5cd04ff8642a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Satyam Zode
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 00:31:42 +0530
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] Fixed is
Source: nasm
Version: 2.11.08
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps fileordering hostname umask
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi!
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
tha
p...@passoire.fr:
> Hi Ximin.
>
> Le 06/04/2016 13:17, Ximin Luo a écrit :
>> The most preferable route would be to persuade upstream to accept patch (2).
>> If they don't do that, then it's still worth doing option (2) over (1)
>
> Thanks for your answer. I will go the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH way.
>
Hi Ximin.
Le 06/04/2016 13:17, Ximin Luo a écrit :
> The most preferable route would be to persuade upstream to accept patch (2).
> If they don't do that, then it's still worth doing option (2) over (1)
Thanks for your answer. I will go the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH way.
How can I handle debian/upstream
Alexis Bienvenüe:
> Hi.
>
> lua-ldoc's maintainer added a --date option that helps reproducible
> building. It is used by lua-penlight.
> However, awesome and lua-posix don't use it already.
>
> What should you recommend?
> 1) patch awesome and lua-posix to use --date
> 2) patch lua-ldoc to add S
Source: cython
Version: 0.23.4+git4-g7eed8d8-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
th
Source: aodh
Version: 1.0.0-11
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that 'aodh' could
Your message dated Wed, 6 Apr 2016 11:01:32 +0200
with message-id <20160406090132.GA31477@matrix.athome>
and subject line 51 has been uploaded to PyPI
has caused the Debian Bug report #817248,
regarding diffoscope 51 not uploaded to pypi
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the pro
Hi.
lua-ldoc's maintainer added a --date option that helps reproducible
building. It is used by lua-penlight.
However, awesome and lua-posix don't use it already.
What should you recommend?
1) patch awesome and lua-posix to use --date
2) patch lua-ldoc to add SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH, on top of --date.
12 matches
Mail list logo