On 2016-04-17, Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> I was wondering what is the performance of various armhf boards, for
> package building. Of course, the reproducible-builds team have a lot of
> stats already. Below I'm sharing the query I used and the results in
> case anyone else is interested in
Package: emoslib
Version: 4.3.9-1
Severity: normal
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that
emoslib is not reproducible changing shell: debian/rules assume the behaviour
of dash's echo, which is
Hi!
I was wondering what is the performance of various armhf boards, for
package building. Of course, the reproducible-builds team have a lot of
stats already. Below I'm sharing the query I used and the results in
case anyone else is interested in this.
Using
Doing some sql queires and a bit of eyeball heuristics, I've determined
the packages listed below frequently FTBFS due to timeout on armhf.
I was hoping we could drop blacklisting altogether as the build network
grew, but I'm not sure that's realistic with the current infrastructure.
Please
Source: kamera
Version: 4:4.14.2-1
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
kamera fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:
[..]
