On Thu, 5 Jan 2017, Ximin Luo wrote:
> I've uploaded version 67 with that commit reverted:
>
> https://people.debian.org/~infinity0/apt/pool/main/d/diffoscope/
Tried 100 times in sid. Built ok 100 times. This is also what happened
to version 66, so I'm not surprised.
But let's see again when th
Маша Глухова:
> I can switch between being able/unable to reproduce this bug by just doing
> git checkout 64/65, without touching any dependencies. git-bisect, with
> test being running build 100 times, points me to the
> commit 0c3c88fc930f3755e6f4fb0879783e2585863e85 as the first one after
> whic
Package: reprotest
Version: 0.4
Severity: wishlist
Dear Maintainer,
One idea that was brought up at RWS2 in Berlin (I forgot who came up with it
now, sorry) is to add a mode to automatically attempt to detect which
variations cause a package to be unreproducible.
For example, given variations {a
Chris Lamb wrote on Thu, Jan 05, 2017 at 11:13:59 +:
> b) Please add any agenda items to:
>
> https://pad.riseup.net/p/reproducible-irc-meeting-7
>
> Items should be suffixed with your name.
Please try to add agenda items ahead of the meeting (at least 24 hours
earlier, the more t
Processing commands for cont...@bugs.debian.org:
> tags 850055 + pending
Bug #850055 [diffoscope] diffoscope: Comparing a device with a regular file
fails
Added tag(s) pending.
> thanks
Stopping processing here.
Please contact me if you need assistance.
--
850055: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin
Dear all,
Thanks to all who attended the IRC meeting on Tuesday and apologies for
this email not being more forthcoming. The minutes and logs are available
here:
http://meetbot.debian.net/reproducible-builds/2017/reproducible-builds.2017-01-03-18.00.html
The next meeting will be held at:
