Re: Moving towards a deb-buildinfo(5) Format 1.0

2017-02-26 Thread James McCoy
On Sun, Feb 19, 2017 at 06:52:16PM +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > Hi! > > On Sat, 2016-11-12 at 19:04:53 +0100, Guillem Jover wrote: > > As I've mentioned elsewhere, I've noticed several things with the > > current .buildinfo format, even after the cleanup pre-merge, that > > I'd like to fix or cha

Bug#856248: trydiffoscope: traceback with "500 Server Error"

2017-02-26 Thread Chris Lamb
Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > Presumably this is an issue server-side, or an API incompatibility An ussue server-side; am on it. Not entirely sure what's going on atm… > I haven't been able to use trydiffoscope for some weeks now Oh no, you should have filed this earlier! Regards, -- ,''

Processing of diffoscope_78~bpo8+1_amd64.changes

2017-02-26 Thread Debian FTP Masters
diffoscope_78~bpo8+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: diffoscope_78~bpo8+1.dsc diffoscope_78~bpo8+1.tar.xz diffoscope_78~bpo8+1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) _

Processing of diffoscope_78~bpo8+1_amd64.changes

2017-02-26 Thread Debian FTP Masters
diffoscope_78~bpo8+1_amd64.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: diffoscope_78~bpo8+1.dsc diffoscope_78~bpo8+1.tar.xz diffoscope_78~bpo8+1_all.deb Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) _

Bug#856248: trydiffoscope: traceback with "500 Server Error"

2017-02-26 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
Package: trydiffoscope Version: 64 Severity: important I haven't been able to use trydiffoscope for some weeks now, getting tracebacks like the following: $ date > a $ # wait a bit... $ date > b $ trydiffoscope a b Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/trydiffoscope", li

Bug#855239: marked as done (diffoscope: Tests that call xxd fail on jessie due to output change)

2017-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2017 21:04:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#855239: fixed in diffoscope 78 has caused the Debian Bug report #855239, regarding diffoscope: Tests that call xxd fail on jessie due to output change to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the p

Bug#855233: marked as done (diffoscope: Crashes when comparing bad JSON on Python pre-3.5)

2017-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2017 21:04:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#855233: fixed in diffoscope 78 has caused the Debian Bug report #855233, regarding diffoscope: Crashes when comparing bad JSON on Python pre-3.5 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem

Bug#855169: marked as done (diffoscope: use BSD-style stat on FreeBSD)

2017-02-26 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Sun, 26 Feb 2017 21:04:30 + with message-id and subject line Bug#855169: fixed in diffoscope 78 has caused the Debian Bug report #855169, regarding diffoscope: use BSD-style stat on FreeBSD to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with

diffoscope_78_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2017-02-26 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2017 17:26:48 +0100 Source: diffoscope Binary: diffoscope Architecture: source Version: 78 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Reproducible builds folks Changed-By: Mattia Rizzolo Descripti

Processing of diffoscope_78_source.changes

2017-02-26 Thread Debian FTP Masters
diffoscope_78_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: diffoscope_78.dsc diffoscope_78.tar.xz diffoscope_78_amd64.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) ___ Reproduc

Bug#817193: diffoscope: failing tests: test_gzip.py::test_metadata, test_ipk.py::test_metadata, test_java.py::test_diff

2017-02-26 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 05:37:51PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 05:48:14PM +0800, Chris Lamb wrote: > > tags 817193 + unreproducible > > thanks > > > > Chris Lamb wrote: > > > > > Are you still any of these test failures with a recent diffoscope > > > versio

Bug#817193: diffoscope: failing tests: test_gzip.py::test_metadata, test_ipk.py::test_metadata, test_java.py::test_diff

2017-02-26 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 05:48:14PM +0800, Chris Lamb wrote: > tags 817193 + unreproducible > thanks > > Chris Lamb wrote: > > > Are you still any of these test failures with a recent diffoscope > > version? We have made a few locale changes recently so its likely > > that at least some of these a