Re: source-only builds and .buildinfo

2017-06-21 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Wed 2017-06-21 15:42:07 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > This is a very useful concept but I suggest you give it a new name. > "binaries-attested upload" perhaps ? I like the idea that we should name this thing, but i'd call it something like a "source-only upload with .buildinfo" or "source+buildin

Re: Please review the draft for week 112's blog post

2017-06-21 Thread Chris Lamb
Chris Lamb wrote: > Please review the draft for week 112's blog post: [..] This has now been published at: https://reproducible.alioth.debian.org/blog/posts/112/ Many thanks all :) Regards, -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁Chris Lamb ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋ la...@debian.org / chris-lamb.co.uk

Re: source-only builds and .buildinfo

2017-06-21 Thread Ian Jackson
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes ("Re: source-only builds and .buildinfo"): > On Wed 2017-06-21 13:38:42 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > Certainly `dgit push' will not do anything to any .buildinfo you may > > have. I think maybe that your use case should be supported by having > > a version of dgit push

Re: source-only builds and .buildinfo

2017-06-21 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Wed 2017-06-21 13:38:42 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > This is an interesting use case which dgit should support. cool! > But I think this is not what dgit push-source should do. Sean's > proposed dgit push-source does not do any kind of binary package > build. I think this is correct. But thi

Re: source-only builds and .buildinfo

2017-06-21 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2017-06-21, Ian Jackson wrote: > Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes ("Re: source-only builds and .buildinfo"): >> On Tue 2017-06-20 18:10:49 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: >> > A .buildinfo file is not useful for a source-only upload which is >> > veried to be identical to the intended source as present in t

Re: source-only builds and .buildinfo

2017-06-21 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Wed 2017-06-21 14:16:00 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 09:30:14AM +, Holger Levsen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> trigger warning: nitpicking. >> >> On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:34:17AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: >> > > I do source-only uploads because i don't want the binaries buil

Re: source-only builds and .buildinfo

2017-06-21 Thread Ian Jackson
Daniel Kahn Gillmor writes ("Re: source-only builds and .buildinfo"): > On Tue 2017-06-20 18:10:49 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > A .buildinfo file is not useful for a source-only upload which is > > veried to be identical to the intended source as present in the > > uploader's version control (eg,

Re: source-only builds and .buildinfo

2017-06-21 Thread Holger Levsen
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 02:16:00PM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > Based on how many broken binaries get uploaded from developers, we should disallow binary uploads for everybody for all packages by default. those porters who need it, should get that enabled for those packages where they need it, whe

Re: source-only builds and .buildinfo

2017-06-21 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 09:30:14AM +, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > trigger warning: nitpicking. > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:34:17AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > > I do source-only uploads because i don't want the binaries built on my > > > own personal infrastructure to reach the public

Re: source-only builds and .buildinfo

2017-06-21 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 10:09:00AM +, Ximin Luo wrote: > Adrian Bunk: > > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 09:28:00AM +, Ximin Luo wrote: > >> Adrian Bunk: > >>> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 02:47:20PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Hi Ian-- > > On Tue 2017-06-20 18:10:49 +0100, Ian J

Запис на телефонни разговори! Научи повече >>

2017-06-21 Thread Callflow
02 874 00 80 Прослушайте всички важни разговори Телефонна централа от ново поколение с още много възможности   ЗАЯВЕТЕ ДЕМО СЕГА!   ПРОБЛЕМИ: Липса на записи Пропускане на детайли Забравяне н

Re: source-only builds and .buildinfo

2017-06-21 Thread Ximin Luo
Adrian Bunk: > On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 09:28:00AM +, Ximin Luo wrote: >> Adrian Bunk: >>> On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 02:47:20PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: Hi Ian-- On Tue 2017-06-20 18:10:49 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > A .buildinfo file is not useful for a source-only upl

Re: source-only builds and .buildinfo

2017-06-21 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 09:28:00AM +, Ximin Luo wrote: > Adrian Bunk: > > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 02:47:20PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > >> Hi Ian-- > >> > >> On Tue 2017-06-20 18:10:49 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > >>> A .buildinfo file is not useful for a source-only upload which is > >

Re: source-only builds and .buildinfo

2017-06-21 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, trigger warning: nitpicking. On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 11:34:17AM +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > I do source-only uploads because i don't want the binaries built on my > > own personal infrastructure to reach the public. But i want to upload > > the .buildinfo because i want to provide a corrob

package uploaded to our repo

2017-06-21 Thread Ximin Luo
gcc-6_6.3.0-19.0~reproducible1.dsc has just been uploaded to https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/ExperimentalToolchain ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman

Re: source-only builds and .buildinfo

2017-06-21 Thread Ximin Luo
Adrian Bunk: > On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 02:47:20PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> Hi Ian-- >> >> On Tue 2017-06-20 18:10:49 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: >>> A .buildinfo file is not useful for a source-only upload which is >>> veried to be identical to the intended source as present in the >>> up

Re: source-only builds and .buildinfo

2017-06-21 Thread Adrian Bunk
On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 02:47:20PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > Hi Ian-- > > On Tue 2017-06-20 18:10:49 +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > > A .buildinfo file is not useful for a source-only upload which is > > veried to be identical to the intended source as present in the > > uploader's version