Фото пътеводител на Източни Родопи

2017-09-19 Thread TRAVEL BOOKS
ФОТО ПЪТЕВОДИТЕЛ НА ИЗТОЧНИ РОДОПИ Нов лимитиран тираж от туристическия бестселър!   Уважаеми читатели,Излезе нов тираж на една от най-харесваните и интересни наши книги -"Фото пътеводител на Източни Родопи".В изданието ще откриете:  Над 60 впечатляващи природни и исторически об

Bug#876239: reproducible: re-deploy cbxi4a (disk failure)

2017-09-19 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
Package: jenkins.debian.org Severity: normal X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org cbxi4a-armhf-rb.debian.net had a critical disk failure. It's been reinstalled, so the ssh keys have changed: 256 SHA256:C8nL+YAOEhjWYH2tkeoP00sfiWi4bI2ZlI400idPBqU root@cbxi4a (ECDSA) 256 SHA25

Bug#876212: reproducible: re-add armhf node ff64a

2017-09-19 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
Package: jenkins.debian.org Severity: normal Tags: patch X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Welcome back ff64a-armhf-rb.debian.net. Specs and fingerprints are unchanged. With the 4.14-rc1 kernel, the firefly-rk3399 boards have working cpufreq support, and so the CPU can run

Re: Help to make bsh reproducible

2017-09-19 Thread Chris Lamb
Hey Jathan, > I just remember that after excuting grep -r php.tar.gz I edited the > debian/rules file I'm certain I'm missing something (!) but I'm still not sure what your grep is meant to find? Assuming you are finding no results, what, exactly were you expecting to locate? :) Best wishes,

Re: Help to make bsh reproducible

2017-09-19 Thread jathan
On 18/09/17 03:02, Chris Lamb wrote: > Hi jathan, > > Thanks for working on apg in the past and thank you for taking on > another package :) > >> following the steps that I did with apg, but in the part which I >> do a grep -r > > Can you elaborate on exactly what you want (or are expecting?) to

Bug#872412: marked as done (reprotest: please add user variation)

2017-09-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2017 12:34:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#872412: fixed in reprotest 0.7 has caused the Debian Bug report #872412, regarding reprotest: please add user variation to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If

Bug#860428: marked as done (reprotest: use an existing HOME in the control build)

2017-09-19 Thread Debian Bug Tracking System
Your message dated Tue, 19 Sep 2017 12:34:53 + with message-id and subject line Bug#860428: fixed in reprotest 0.7 has caused the Debian Bug report #860428, regarding reprotest: use an existing HOME in the control build to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been

reprotest_0.7_source.changes ACCEPTED into unstable

2017-09-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters
Accepted: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Format: 1.8 Date: Tue, 19 Sep 2017 14:18:18 +0200 Source: reprotest Binary: reprotest Architecture: source Version: 0.7 Distribution: unstable Urgency: medium Maintainer: Reproducible builds folks Changed-By: Ximin Luo Description: r

Processing of reprotest_0.7_source.changes

2017-09-19 Thread Debian FTP Masters
reprotest_0.7_source.changes uploaded successfully to localhost along with the files: reprotest_0.7.dsc reprotest_0.7.tar.xz reprotest_0.7_source.buildinfo Greetings, Your Debian queue daemon (running on host usper.debian.org) ___ Reprodu

Re: Bug#876055: Environment variable handling for reproducible builds

2017-09-19 Thread Ximin Luo
Russ Allbery: > [..] It does mean that discovery of any new > such environment variable would require a change to our whitelist in > approach (3), so there would be some lag and the whitelist would become > long over time (with a corresponding testing load). But (3) does try to > achieve that use

Re: Bug#876055: Environment variable handling for reproducible builds

2017-09-19 Thread Ximin Luo
Ximin Luo: > [..] > > (The last time I erroneously included PATH in the final "excluded" list - > because we have varied PATH but in a really trivial way on tests.r-b.org for > ages - but I now agree with you that we shouldn't expect reproducibility when > PATH is varied.) > Actually thinking

Re: Bug#876055: Environment variable handling for reproducible builds

2017-09-19 Thread Ximin Luo
Simon McVittie: > On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 at 18:00:51 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: >> [..] >> >> I consider unintended variables that affect the build output a bug, and >> variables designed and intended to change the behavior of the toolchain >> expected, reasonable behavior. > > There is a *huge*

Re: Bug#876055: Environment variable handling for reproducible builds

2017-09-19 Thread Simon McVittie
(Re-sending this to the bug rather than to debian-policy, sorry for the duplicate on -policy) On Mon, 18 Sep 2017 at 18:00:51 -0700, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > There is a huge difference between variables that *might* affect the > build as an unintended input that gets stored in a resulting packag