Re: [PATCH] Make use of gpg more flexible

2016-10-31 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Daniel, On Sat, Oct 29, 2016 at 10:09:55AM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > It should work with jessie -- i tried to only make changes that were > backward-compatible. If that's not the case, please let me know. thanks for confirming & will do, if needed! :) -- cheers, Holger

Re: [PATCH] Make use of gpg more flexible

2016-10-29 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
On Fri 2016-10-28 17:17:10 -0400, Holger Levsen wrote: > thanks for chiming in…! > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 01:51:30PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: >> This set of commands should work with modern versions of gpg (2.1.x) >> as well, and should be independent of potentially variable output. > >

Re: [PATCH] Make use of gpg more flexible

2016-10-28 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Daniel, thanks for chiming in…! On Fri, Oct 28, 2016 at 01:51:30PM -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > This set of commands should work with modern versions of gpg (2.1.x) > as well, and should be independent of potentially variable output. does it also work with jessie? jenkins.d.(n|o) runs

[PATCH] Make use of gpg more flexible

2016-10-28 Thread Daniel Kahn Gillmor
This set of commands should work with modern versions of gpg (2.1.x) as well, and should be independent of potentially variable output. Additionally, we want the key to be signing-capable, but nothing else. We also have no need to generate an encryption-capable subkey, so just drop that part. ---