Hi,
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:33:04AM +0100, Reiner Herrmann wrote:
> > [https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/info-gnu/2010-07/msg00023.html]
> >
> > " * WARNING: Future backward-incompatibility!
> > " Wildcards are not documented as returning sorted values, but up to and
> > " including this
Hi,
I don't really have much to add, but since I was explicitly pinged:
On 03/23/2016 12:33 AM, Reiner Herrmann wrote:
> I think the best solution would be to change the default again to let
> wildcard sort the lists (it will probably make a bunch of packages
> reproducible without having to
Hi Bela and Christian,
[ adding reproducible-builds list to CC ]
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 03:54:33PM -0700, Bela Lubkin wrote:
> Replying out of band off of the dietlibc list because this isn't about
> dietlibc...
> >
> >
