On 2016-02-04, Holger Levsen wrote:
> I'd like to add proper licencing to the presentations in
> git.debian.org/git/reproducible/presentations.git and you in the to: headers
> of the mail are a git commiter to this repository, so I would like you to
> (re-)licence your contributions under the
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 11:07:41AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> but in any case the question is: are you fine to licence your work under
> Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License or (at the choice of the
> user of the works) under GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or
>
Hi,
On 16-02-04 11:07:41, Holger Levsen wrote:
> but in any case the question is: are you fine to licence your work under
> Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License or (at the choice of the
> user of the works) under GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or
> later,
> with
Hi,
On 04/02/16 at 11:07 +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> but in any case the question is: are you fine to licence your work under
> Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License or (at the choice of the
> user of the works) under GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.3 or
> later,
>
Hi,
I forgot to say…
On Donnerstag, 4. Februar 2016, Holger Levsen wrote:
> but in any case the question is: are you fine to licence your work under
> Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License or (at the choice of
> the user of the works) under GNU Free Documentation License, Version
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 11:07:41AM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> but in any case the question is: are you fine to licence your work under
> Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License or (at the choice of the
I'm going to assume you mean the unported "variant" here.
> user of the
