Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#818856: diffoscope: crashes on broken symlinks

Hi Reiner! Thank you for reviewing patch. I have made all the changes you mentioned above. Please find an attachment :-) Cheers, Satyam Zode From 2e440a527e4689a6f4321695801b5cd04ff8642a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Satyam Zode Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 00:31:42 +0530

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#818856: Bug#818856: diffoscope: crashes on broken symlinks

Hi Reiner! I did some trivial changes. Please find an attached patch. This patch closes #818856 and #796262. Thanks! Satyam Zode From 85c062d32b84ed6d8fcf5a80f0d2a2fbb4e43e54 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Satyam Zode Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2016 01:15:04 +0530 Subject: [PATCH]

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#820240: lua-ldoc: please honour SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

Source: lua-ldoc Version: 1.4.3-5 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch upstream User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: toolchain X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Control: forwarded -1 https://github.com/stevedonovan/LDoc/pull/233 Dear Maintainer, While

[Reproducible-builds] lua-ldoc --date/SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

Hi. lua-ldoc's maintainer added a --date option that helps reproducible building. It is used by lua-penlight. However, awesome and lua-posix don't use it already. What should you recommend? 1) patch awesome and lua-posix to use --date 2) patch lua-ldoc to add SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH, on top of --date.

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#820183: cython: please make the build reproducible (timestamps)

Source: cython Version: 0.23.4+git4-g7eed8d8-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed

Re: [Reproducible-builds] lua-ldoc --date/SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

Alexis Bienvenüe: > Hi. > > lua-ldoc's maintainer added a --date option that helps reproducible > building. It is used by lua-penlight. > However, awesome and lua-posix don't use it already. > > What should you recommend? > 1) patch awesome and lua-posix to use --date > 2) patch lua-ldoc to add

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#818856: Bug#818856: diffoscope: crashes on broken symlinks

On Thu, 2016-04-07 at 00:42 +0530, Satyam Zode wrote: > Thank you for reviewing patch. I have made all the changes you > mentioned above. Please find an attachment :-) This will works better but will still give a crash when both symlinks are broken and point to a filename of the same length;

Re: [Reproducible-builds] lua-ldoc --date/SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

p...@passoire.fr: > Hi Ximin. > > Le 06/04/2016 13:17, Ximin Luo a écrit : >> The most preferable route would be to persuade upstream to accept patch (2). >> If they don't do that, then it's still worth doing option (2) over (1) > > Thanks for your answer. I will go the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH way. >

Re: [Reproducible-builds] lua-ldoc --date/SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

Hi Ximin. Le 06/04/2016 13:17, Ximin Luo a écrit : > The most preferable route would be to persuade upstream to accept patch (2). > If they don't do that, then it's still worth doing option (2) over (1) Thanks for your answer. I will go the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH way. How can I handle

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#817248: marked as done (diffoscope 51 not uploaded to pypi)

Your message dated Wed, 6 Apr 2016 11:01:32 +0200 with message-id <20160406090132.GA31477@matrix.athome> and subject line 51 has been uploaded to PyPI has caused the Debian Bug report #817248, regarding diffoscope 51 not uploaded to pypi to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#820179: aodh: please make the build reproducible (timestamps)

Source: aodh Version: 1.0.0-11 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that 'aodh' could

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#820194: nasm: please make the build reproducible (font ordering in documentation)

Source: nasm Version: 2.11.08 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps fileordering hostname umask X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed