Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#812428: libgcrypt20: please make the build reproducible (timestamps)

2016-02-11 Thread Andreas Metzler
On 2016-01-24 Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote: > On Sat 2016-01-23 16:52:09 -0500, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: >> While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed >> that libgcrypt20 could not be built reproducibly. >> The attached patch adds support for

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#814403: ckeditor: FTBFS: /usr/bin/ckbuilder: 2: /usr/bin/ckbuilder: Syntax error: Unterminated quoted string

2016-02-11 Thread Chris Lamb
Source: ckeditor Version: 4.5.6+dfsg-1 Severity: serious Justification: fails to build from source User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, ckeditor fails to build from source in unstable/amd64:

Re: [Reproducible-builds] new armhf node (Cubox-i4x4), part 2

2016-02-11 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, and 3 new armhf builder jobs created…! cheers, Holger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Ideas about TimestampsFromCPPMacros issue.

2016-02-11 Thread Dhole
On 16-02-11 20:13:25, Ximin Luo wrote: > Juan Picca: > > From the issue page > > (https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/TimestampsFromCPPMacros) > > i see that the usage of SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH was > > discouraged in the gcc-patches mailing list thread. > > > > Hi Juan, I think that was not

[Reproducible-builds] Ideas about TimestampsFromCPPMacros issue.

2016-02-11 Thread Juan Picca
Ximin, Dhole: Thanks for correct my misconception about the state of the issue and the discouragement of the patch sent by Dhole. Thanks to Dhole too for update the wiki page of the issue. Greetings, JMPC > On 16-02-11 20:13:25, Ximin Luo wrote: > > Juan Picca: > > > From the issue page > > >

Re: [Reproducible-builds] new armhf node (Cubox-i4x4), part 2

2016-02-11 Thread Vagrant Cascadian
On 2016-02-01, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > cbxi4a-armhf-rb.debian.net: > Cubox-i4x4, imx6 quad-core, 2GB ram, ~60GB SATA SSD Upgraded cbxi4a to 3.8GB of ram! And added another node to join it: cbxi4b-armhf-rb.debian.net: Cubox-i4x4, imx6 quad-core, 3.8GB ram, ~60GB SATA SSD ssh port: 2240 ssh

Re: [Reproducible-builds] new armhf node (Cubox-i4x4), part 2

2016-02-11 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Vagrant, On Donnerstag, 11. Februar 2016, Vagrant Cascadian wrote: > Upgraded cbxi4a to 3.8GB of ram! yay! (I'll now distribute 8 builders jobs to those with ~4gb, 6 builders for 2gb and 3 for 1gb… for now, we'll see how that goes… (before we had 6 builders for 2gb and 3 for 1gb)) > And