Package: python-phply
Version: 0.9.1-3
Severity: minor
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: randomness
Dear Maintainer,
While checking this package with the reproducible builds[1] tool
chain, I noticed that building the package with
DEB_BUILD_OPTIONS="nocheck" set causes th
Source: binutils
Version: 2.26-9
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
Whilst working on the "reproducible builds" effort [0], we noticed that
binutils could not be built reproducibly.
Patch attached that makes the existing sed calls case-i
(I ask that everyone spend some undisturbed and unpressured time to read and
digest what I'm about to write. Hopefully this way we can avoid unnecessary
redundant replies that don't contribute new information and only risk adding
fuel to any potential flamewars.)
Alexis Bienvenüe:
> Therefore,
Hi Brian,
Brian May wrote:
> Axel Beckert writes:
> > mkdocs integrates build time stamps into the documentation it is
> > generating. This makes at least unburden-home-dir no more reproducibly
> > building because it now uses mkdocs to generate HTML documentation at
> > build time.
>
> Is this
Hi.
The support of SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH added in pdftex/dvipdfm-x is great, and
does a very good job at building reproducible binary software packages.
SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH allows to fix the metadata timestamps in the compiled
document, and when SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH_TEX_PRIMITIVES is set to 1, the tex
prim
Source: clearsilver
Version: 0.10.5-1.6
Severity: serious
Justification: fails to build from source
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
clearsilver fails to build from source in unstable/amd64