[Reproducible-builds] Bug#824689: cdbs: syntax error in perl-makemaker.mk

2016-05-18 Thread Niko Tyni
Package: cdbs Version: 0.4.133 Severity: serious User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: ftbfs X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org, pkg-perl-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org Many packages are failing to build on current sid with these symptoms:

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#824653: elkcode: please make the build reproducible (environment)

2016-05-18 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
Source: elkcode Version: 2.3.22-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch upstream User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: environment X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [Tails-dev] tails binary and source packages lists URL has changed…

2016-05-18 Thread intrigeri
Holger Levsen wrote (18 May 2016 08:27:05 GMT) : > On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 06:48:49PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: >> > I'll gladly merge this whenever you tell me I should. >> Please go ahead :) > cool, done. thanks! >

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Fwd: Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#824266: mkdocs: Please support SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH specification for build time stamps [origin: b...@debian.org]

2016-05-18 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi again, Axel Beckert wrote: > could someone more python-savvy than me have a look at this claim that > our SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH example for Python on > https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/TimestampsProposal#Examples > is wrong. > > The claim is here: >

[Reproducible-builds] Fwd: Re: [Python-modules-team] Bug#824266: mkdocs: Please support SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH specification for build time stamps [origin: b...@debian.org]

2016-05-18 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi, could someone more python-savvy than me have a look at this claim that our SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH example for Python on https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/TimestampsProposal#Examples is wrong. The claim is here: https://github.com/mkdocs/mkdocs/issues/938#issuecomment-219574932 -

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#824639: openblas: please make the build reproducible (fileordering)

2016-05-18 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
Source: openblas Version: 0.2.18-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch upstream User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: fileordering X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Dear Maintainer, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed

Re: [Reproducible-builds] [Tails-dev] tails binary and source packages lists URL has changed…

2016-05-18 Thread Holger Levsen
Hey, On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 06:48:49PM +0200, intrigeri wrote: > >> I'm working on it and hope to fix it today. > Repaired! > > I'll gladly merge this whenever you tell me I should. > Please go ahead :) cool, done.