Package: cdbs
Version: 0.4.133
Severity: serious
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: ftbfs
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org,
pkg-perl-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org
Many packages are failing to build on current sid with these symptoms:
Source: elkcode
Version: 2.3.22-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch upstream
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: environment
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that
Holger Levsen wrote (18 May 2016 08:27:05 GMT) :
> On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 06:48:49PM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
>> > I'll gladly merge this whenever you tell me I should.
>> Please go ahead :)
> cool, done.
thanks!
>
Hi again,
Axel Beckert wrote:
> could someone more python-savvy than me have a look at this claim that
> our SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH example for Python on
> https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/TimestampsProposal#Examples
> is wrong.
>
> The claim is here:
>
Hi,
could someone more python-savvy than me have a look at this claim that
our SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH example for Python on
https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds/TimestampsProposal#Examples
is wrong.
The claim is here:
https://github.com/mkdocs/mkdocs/issues/938#issuecomment-219574932
-
Source: openblas
Version: 0.2.18-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch upstream
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: fileordering
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Dear Maintainer,
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
Hey,
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 06:48:49PM +0200, intrigeri wrote:
> >> I'm working on it and hope to fix it today.
> Repaired!
> > I'll gladly merge this whenever you tell me I should.
> Please go ahead :)
cool, done.