On Fri, Mar 11, 2016 at 03:03:28PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Mittwoch, 9. März 2016, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > > I'll be able link to build logs in koji (the Fedora build system) once
> > > python-libarchive-c passes review and I can bui
Package: diffoscope
Version: 48
Hi,
I'm trying to package diffoscope for Fedora and the tests listed
in $subject are failing. Seems to be some timezone issue:
= FAILURES
==
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 01:09:17PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> package: diffoscope
> version: 51
> severity: minor
> x-debbugs-cc: "Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek" <zbys...@in.waw.pl>
>
> Hi,
>
> thanks for making us aware of this issue!
>
> On Mittw
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 01:07:13PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> http://pypi.debian.net/diffoscope should be better
> http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/d/diffoscope/
Thanks. Both seem to work indeed (apart from pypi missing some tarballs of
course).
Zbyszek
On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 03:03:53PM +0100, Holger Levsen wrote:
> control: reopen -1
>
> Hi,
>
> On Mittwoch, 9. März 2016, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > The tests still fail with v. 51:
>
> ok, reopening, thanks for confirming!
>
> > If I set
Subject: diffoscope: wrongly reports "No differences found inside, yet data
differs"
Package: diffoscope
Version: 51
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
when comparing two initramfs images [1,2], diffoscope reports:
[1] http://in.waw.pl/~zbyszek/diffoscope/initramfs-4.5.0-302.fc24.x86_64.img
[2]
On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 10:34:59PM +0200, Reiner Herrmann wrote:
> Hi Zbigniew,
>
> thanks for the report!
> I just had a short look at this issue.
> The problem why diffoscope doesn't see this change is that the initramfs
> contains actually multiple cpio archives, but diffoscope treats
> the
I "enabled" the cbfs tests by installing the appropriate dependency
(coreboot-utils),
and one more test starting failing:
=== FAILURES ===
_ test_listing _
differences
On Sun, Feb 26, 2017 at 05:37:51PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 05:48:14PM +0800, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > tags 817193 + unreproducible
> > thanks
> >
> > Chris Lamb wrote:
> >
> > > Are you still any of th
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 05:48:14PM +0800, Chris Lamb wrote:
> tags 817193 + unreproducible
> thanks
>
> Chris Lamb wrote:
>
> > Are you still any of these test failures with a recent diffoscope
> > version? We have made a few locale changes recently so its likely
> > that at least some of these
=== FAILURES ===
_ test_listing _
differences = [,
]
@skip_unless_tools_exist('cbfstool')
def test_listing(differences):
expected_diff =
I noticed that I was missing ppudmp from my installation, so tests
were skipped. Once it is installed, the ppu tests also fail. Looks
like a programming error, PpuFile is File, not FilesystemFile from a
quick look.
=== FAILURES ===
On Fri, Mar 03, 2017 at 04:11:57PM +0800, Chris Lamb wrote:
> https://bugs.debian.org/847595
>
> https://anonscm.debian.org/git/reproducible/diffoscope.git/commit/?id=fcbcafa1b1cefb08a7ffbd8936f22c5bc6849991
Cool, thanks!
I added a note to our spec file, and we'll just wait for the fixes to
Package: diffoscope
Version: 91
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
I'm trying to update diffoscope to version 91 in Fedora rawhide, and
the tests failing for reasons I haven't diagnosed yet (it builds fine
locally, but fails on an s390x builder). When the tests are failing, a
try..except clause
14 matches
Mail list logo
