Re: [Reproducible-builds] Usefulness of periodic reproducible builds e-mails
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 02:27:18PM +0200, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > > Markus (and the others), do you think it's ok to keep the notifications > if they are limited to unstable ? Or would you prefer disabling them > completely until the build environment stabilizes? I think there is value in receiving these notifications, they provide timely feedback about the status of our packages. Maybe we can setup a mailing list for this, something like pkg-java-bui...@lists.alioth.debian.org? (we already have pkg-java-commits, for example). I also don't mind filtering the reproducible reports in my email client if there is not other alternatives, of course. -- Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at http://miguel.cc/key. "Faith means not wanting to know what is true." -- Nietzsche signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Re: [Reproducible-builds] libibatis-java changed in testing: reproducible -> FTBFS
On Tue, Sep 29, 2015 at 03:04:31PM +, Mattia Rizzolo wrote: > > I'm very sorry about those particular emails. > The last two days we had sever issues with the build host that cause a > really big bunch of FTBFS due to ENOSPC. > All the affected packages are already queued up for rebuilding, but it > takes time to rebuild all of them (FYI, currently there are more than > 750 build in the queue only for this, used to be ~1000 this morning). No worries, I understand. BTW, can another builds be retried? I was interested on retriggering jruby build since is tagged as FTBFS since some days ago and I know for sure is not FTBFS. When I inspect the log for the failed build I found out[1] an incomplete log file, so I suspect it was also a disk space related problem as well. Cheers, 1. https://reproducible.debian.net/rbuild/unstable/amd64/jruby_1.7.22-1.rbuild.log -- Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at http://miguel.cc/key. "Faith means not wanting to know what is true." -- Nietzsche signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Re: [Reproducible-builds] libibatis-java changed in testing: reproducible -> FTBFS
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 11:05:15PM +, Reproducible builds folks wrote: > More information on > https://reproducible.debian.net/testing/amd64/libibatis-java, feel free to > reply to this email to get more help. Hi folks, Thank you very much for your helpful periodic email reports about packages reproducibility. However, you should be more careful about false positive FTBFS reports since in this case the failure came from lack of disk space in the autobuilder. Cheers, -- Miguel Landaeta, nomadium at debian.org secure email with PGP 0x6E608B637D8967E9 available at http://miguel.cc/key. "Faith means not wanting to know what is true." -- Nietzsche signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ Reproducible-builds mailing list Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
