Package: sbuild
Version: 0.73.0-4
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: infrastructure
Hello,
dpkg-buildpackage typically generates a .changes and .buildinfo file,
and signs both (since at least dpkg 1.18.19).
But when using sbuild, dpkg-buildpackage inside of
d.
There might still be other reproducibility issues after this.
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
diff -Nru
linux-grsec-4.6.3/debian/patches/features/all/grsec/reproducible-randstruct.patch
linux-grsec-4.6.3/debian/patches/features/all/grsec/reproducible-randstruct.patch
tags 816072 + fixed-upstream
thanks
tar 1.29 is released today with this feature \o/
Please consider packaging it so that dpkg can fix #759886
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
hese armhf nodes!
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/reproducible-builds
Hi,
I'm curious if anyone has tried using a network filesystem in this kind
of setup. I would think, "diskless" boards sharing a NAS allows for
easier provisioning and probably cheaper storage by centralising it.
Though I don't know how that performs in practice?
Regards,
--
Steven C
ork is still needed yet.
(Annoying that there are so many cheap boards that claim to be/do so
much and yet, are of little practical use if they can only boot a
vendor-supplied kernel).
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signat
Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> [...] It missed another bit. Thanks for double-checking, I hadn't
> tested the other change properly.
And thanks for fixing this! The changes from diffoscope/48 to 49
have made it 26x faster for this particular test case.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.
Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
> Steven Chamberlain:
> > But it will still stat() everything in the containing directory,
> > looking for .debs. It also opens some files and reads them - even
> > decompressing random .gz files along the way!
>
> Are you sure that it is a
an use?
Probably a new flag, that would apply --mode a=rwx only to symlinks.
Or are there other ideas how to fix this?
Thanks,
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Reproducible-builds mailin
amd64, but it only produces armel and
arch:all binaries, so it is quite reasonable that this is now only built
and tested for reproducibility on armhf.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital sig
sion over
current behaviour, but can be substituted for ARCHITECTURES="amd64" if
too many arch:all packages FTBFS on armhf.
From a759d049b1fd6deeb24985e57a3b6f4fa2e1f72b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Steven Chamberlain <ste...@pyro.eu.org>
Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 13:02:13 +
Subject: [PATC
Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> using Helmut's tool, I've been able to rebootstrap a minimal Debian
> linux-i386 chroot (445 binary packages[3]). These were cross-compiled
> from source, by only running kfreebsd-amd64 binaries on a FreeBSD
> kernel, and having some Arch:all packages inst
://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/Week-of-Mon-20151123/003992.html
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
a nice demo of diffoscope if it can
do this, although it might not know how to disassemble this properly.
I uploaded the firmwares here but I think something broke... it has been
"in queue, please wait" for over an hour :( The files were 25MB each.
https://try.diffoscope.org/quvzskqbuysh
Regards,
thought this was a good
example of the current state-of-the-art, and why we'd like our binaries
and eventually, installer and VM images reproducible IMHO.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
Steven Chamberlain wrote:
> I uploaded the firmwares here but I think something broke... it has been
> "in queue, please wait" for over an hour :( The files were 25MB each.
> https://try.diffoscope.org/quvzskqbuysh
Okay, I did eventually finish. As suspected, diffoscope (
pe/commit/302190ac958b35fe95a0c2bc2d2a30f214822fc1
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debia
defined (since ../debian/changelog may not exist), which we need
when calling makefs from within that Makefile. We export it for use by
gen-tarball to avoid duplication there.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.
of a directory?
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo
Package: kfreebsd-source-10.1
Version: 10.1~svn274115-6
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch pending
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Steven Chamberlain wrote:
[...] I guess we could chmod before building the tarball:
On second thoughts, that's not as efficient as using tar's --mode option
so I'll use that. The example given on the Debian Wiki page is more
comprehensive than my chmod anyway.
--- debian/rules(revision
or deduplication.
I suggest to only 'clamp' timestamps to the latest entry in
debian/changelog. I think only timestamps newer than this are likely
an issue for reproducibility. Older timestamps are potentially still
useful.
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
Package: src:kfreebsd-10
Version: 10.1~svn274115-4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch pending
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: fileordering
Hi,
The kfreebsd-10 (kernel) packaging creates two source tarballs:
* orig.tar.xz, updated by the package maintainer for each new
that seem like the neatest way, or do you have better suggestions?
(I thought this problem would be quite common, so I could add it to the
Wiki FAQ).
Thanks!
Regards,
--
Steven Chamberlain
ste...@pyro.eu.org
___
Reproducible-builds mailing list
Reproducible
24 matches
Mail list logo