On Fri 2015-02-13 11:10:31 -0500, Holger Levsen wrote:
Hi,
On Samstag, 7. Februar 2015, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
I think it really is not helpful. It's like having a category
“needs_more_work_to_understand_the_problem”.
actually I think such a category, or even such categories, would be
Hi,
Quoting Holger Levsen (2015-02-13 17:10:31)
On Samstag, 7. Februar 2015, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
I think it really is not helpful. It's like having a category
“needs_more_work_to_understand_the_problem”.
actually I think such a category, or even such categories, would be helpful.
I
Holger Levsen:
commit 8e6f562714fa51dc6386c8035e5b59653bc60d1b
Author: Holger Levsen hol...@layer-acht.org
Date: Sat Feb 7 11:36:55 2015 +0100
add new issue, randomness_in_gnu_build_id and, so far, two packages
affected by it: encfs and bacula
This does not help. Build ID differs
Holger Levsen:
On Samstag, 7. Februar 2015, Jérémy Bobbio wrote:
Build ID differs because the content of the binary
on which it has been calculated differs [1]. It's only random if there is
randomness in the content.
ah!
Just writing “randomness_in_gnu_build_id” is equivalent to
