Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#805321: Bug#805321: debian-installer: builds unreproducible netboot images

2015-11-28 Thread Mattia Rizzolo
On Sat, Nov 28, 2015 at 12:08:44AM +, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > > FWIW, I'm not exactly entirely convinced by the exporting of the > > SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH variable from debian/rules; all other variables have > > been passed without exporting so I'm wondering if we shouldn't adapt > > this to

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#805321: Bug#805321: debian-installer: builds unreproducible netboot images

2015-11-27 Thread Steven Chamberlain
Hi, Cyril Brulebois wrote: > I've cherry-picked 3 patches from there onto master locally and I'm > currently running diffoscope to see how that goes (and it's taking > ages…): I'm guessing the initrd would differ if the Linux tool to generate it stores timestamps. If its compressed size varies

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#805321: Bug#805321: debian-installer: builds unreproducible netboot images

2015-11-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Hi, Steven Chamberlain (2015-11-22): > I rewrote the patches according to KiBi's feedback and they are > now uploaded to our jessie-kfreebsd suite, and this Git branch: > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/d-i/debian-installer.git/log/?h=jessie-kfreebsd I've cherry-picked 3

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#805321: Bug#805321: debian-installer: builds unreproducible netboot images

2015-11-25 Thread Cyril Brulebois
Cyril Brulebois (2015-11-26): > I've cherry-picked 3 patches from there onto master locally and I'm > currently running diffoscope to see how that goes (and it's taking > ages…): > c182491b05fec16497f2bf1290cac16773d175f9 > 5d59fd1813e794d0821c00757dd56fd9ca25ed16 >