Re: [Reproducible-builds] getting dpkg ready for reproducible sid

2016-05-17 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi Guillem, On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 01:58:42AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > Ok, so tar 1.29 has just been released and uploaded to Debian. I've > reworked the patch as mentioned above, and will merge it for 1.18.8, > and will do the same for most of the others. awesome news! looking much

Re: [Reproducible-builds] getting dpkg ready for reproducible sid

2016-05-17 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Tue, 2016-05-10 at 10:34:08 +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Mon, 2016-05-09 at 12:26:13 +, Holger Levsen wrote: > > b.) common build timestamp for all files created at a later time > > Pending release of new upstream tar. And the patch reworked to stop > trying to detect the presence

Re: [Reproducible-builds] getting dpkg ready for reproducible sid

2016-05-16 Thread Guillem Jover
On Tue, 2016-05-10 at 12:54:04 +0300, Niko Tyni wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 10:34:08AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > > On Mon, 2016-05-09 at 12:26:13 +, Holger Levsen wrote: > > > f.) add support for .buildinfo files > > > > I need to finish commenting on this, hopefully in the coming

Re: [Reproducible-builds] getting dpkg ready for reproducible sid

2016-05-10 Thread Niko Tyni
On Tue, May 10, 2016 at 10:34:08AM +0200, Guillem Jover wrote: > On Mon, 2016-05-09 at 12:26:13 +, Holger Levsen wrote: > > f.) add support for .buildinfo files > > I need to finish commenting on this, hopefully in the coming days. > > And wasn't it missing at least man pages for the

Re: [Reproducible-builds] getting dpkg ready for reproducible sid

2016-05-10 Thread Guillem Jover
Hi! On Mon, 2016-05-09 at 12:26:13 +, Holger Levsen wrote: > Looking at this I notice we have some changes without bugs and some > changes involving several bugs, still I think it would be good to > discuss them as uploaded. > > IOW: dear dpkg maintainers, what are your comments regarding

Re: [Reproducible-builds] getting dpkg ready for reproducible sid

2016-05-09 Thread Holger Levsen
On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 07:28:30PM +0200, Axel Beckert wrote: > > if (! exists($ENV{SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH_TEX_PRIMITIVES})) { > > $ENV{SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH_TEX_PRIMITIVES} = 1; > It actually has reached Debian about a month ago, but just in > Experimental: >

Re: [Reproducible-builds] getting dpkg ready for reproducible sid

2016-05-09 Thread Axel Beckert
Hi, Alexis Bienvenüe wrote: > Maybe it should be good to also have (to be merged with ddce83d) > > if (! exists($ENV{SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH_TEX_PRIMITIVES})) { > $ENV{SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH_TEX_PRIMITIVES} = 1; > } > > in dpkg-buildpackage (see summary and pointers in >

Re: [Reproducible-builds] getting dpkg ready for reproducible sid

2016-05-09 Thread Alexis Bienvenüe
Hi. Le 09/05/2016 14:26, Holger Levsen a écrit : > ddce83d dpkg-buildpackage: Preset build timestamp to latest changelog entry > > Are there any other changes needed in dpkg for Reproducible builds of Debian? Maybe it should be good to also have (to be merged with ddce83d) if (!

[Reproducible-builds] getting dpkg ready for reproducible sid

2016-05-09 Thread Holger Levsen
Hi, so dpkg 1.18.7 was uploaded to sid today and Mattia promply rebased our patches on it and uploaded the following changes to our repo: dpkg (1.18.7.0~reproducible0) UNRELEASED; urgency=low [ Jérémy Bobbio ] * Use a single timestamp for ar headers when building a .deb. * Use the common