Re: [Reproducible-builds] lua-ldoc --date/SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

p...@passoire.fr: > Hi Ximin. > > Le 06/04/2016 13:17, Ximin Luo a écrit : >> The most preferable route would be to persuade upstream to accept patch (2). >> If they don't do that, then it's still worth doing option (2) over (1) > > Thanks for your answer. I will go the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH way. >

Re: [Reproducible-builds] lua-ldoc --date/SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

Hi Ximin. Le 06/04/2016 13:17, Ximin Luo a écrit : > The most preferable route would be to persuade upstream to accept patch (2). > If they don't do that, then it's still worth doing option (2) over (1) Thanks for your answer. I will go the SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH way. How can I handle

Re: [Reproducible-builds] lua-ldoc --date/SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

Alexis Bienvenüe: > Hi. > > lua-ldoc's maintainer added a --date option that helps reproducible > building. It is used by lua-penlight. > However, awesome and lua-posix don't use it already. > > What should you recommend? > 1) patch awesome and lua-posix to use --date > 2) patch lua-ldoc to add

[Reproducible-builds] lua-ldoc --date/SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH

Hi. lua-ldoc's maintainer added a --date option that helps reproducible building. It is used by lua-penlight. However, awesome and lua-posix don't use it already. What should you recommend? 1) patch awesome and lua-posix to use --date 2) patch lua-ldoc to add SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH, on top of --date.