Re: [Reproducible-builds] please don't build on archs that packages don't declare support for

Michael R. Crusoe wrote: > It looks fixed on my end; thanks! > https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/rb-pkg/testing/armhf/khmer.html Yep! khmer will now only build its arch-dep and -indep binaries on amd64. https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/unstable/armhf/index_not_for_us.html now has 255

Re: [Reproducible-builds] please don't build on archs that packages don't declare support for

Hi, On Dienstag, 9. Februar 2016, Steven Chamberlain wrote: > I think bin/reproducible_build.sh makes a too broad assumption, that > packages producing arch:all parts can build on "any" arch. indeed > dpkg-buildpackage proceeds, I think, because there are arch-indep parts > that 'might' be

Re: [Reproducible-builds] please don't build on archs that packages don't declare support for

Hi, Holger Levsen wrote: > khmer is being tried to build (on armhf), because it has "all" in the > Architecture field I think bin/reproducible_build.sh makes a too broad assumption, that packages producing arch:all parts can build on "any" arch. dpkg-buildpackage proceeds, I think, because

Re: [Reproducible-builds] please don't build on archs that packages don't declare support for

Hi Michael, thanks for reaching out to us and reporting this…! On Samstag, 6. Februar 2016, Michael R. Crusoe wrote: > I think you all are the bee's knees. However, some of the packages I > maintain aren't compatible with 32 bit architectures, like armhf, and are > explicitly marked as such.

Re: [Reproducible-builds] please don't build on archs that packages don't declare support for

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 10:13 AM Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi Michael, > > thanks for reaching out to us and reporting this…! > Of course! On Samstag, 6. Februar 2016, Michael R. Crusoe wrote: > > I think you all are the bee's knees. However, some of the packages I > >

[Reproducible-builds] please don't build on archs that packages don't declare support for

Hello reproducible builds team! I think you all are the bee's knees. However, some of the packages I maintain aren't compatible with 32 bit architectures, like armhf, and are explicitly marked as such. Yet the reproducible builds infrastructure still tries to build on the incompatible