On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 08:59:59PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> > To: reproducible-comm...@lists.alioth.debian.org,
> > diffosc...@lists.reproducible-builds.org
> that's a different mailing list, on alioth, reproducible-commits.
> I'm talking about rb-commits, on reproducible-builds.org:
>
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 07:50:11PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > hm, that makes rb-commits@l.r-b.o more noisy and less specific, so maybe
> > > we should
> > > use diffoscope-comm...@lists.reproducible-builds.org instead?
> >
> > I don't think it wold: rb-commits is *not used* at all right
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 07:16:41PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 06:04:35PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > > Shouldn't we drop the mails to
> > > > reproducible-comm...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> > > > and just send them to diffosc...@lists.reproducible-builds.org?!
> >
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 06:04:35PM +, Holger Levsen wrote:
> > > Shouldn't we drop the mails to
> > > reproducible-comm...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> > > and just send them to diffosc...@lists.reproducible-builds.org?!
> > IMHO, we shouldn't email them to diffoscope@l.r-b.o either, but instead
On Tue, Feb 07, 2017 at 06:55:20PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> [ dropping r-b-commits@l.a.d.o and using instead r-b@l.a.d.o; the former
> is very much not a discussion channel ]
agreed & thanks.
> > Shouldn't we drop the mails to reproducible-comm...@lists.alioth.debian.org
> > and just send
