[Reproducible-builds] Bug#774484: tar: please stop recording current time when generating tar.1

Source: tar Version: 1.27.1-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that tar could not be built reproducibly. The current time gets written to the tar.1 manp

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#774496: ncurses: please make ncurses build reproducibly

Source: ncurses Version: 5.9+20140913-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that ncurses could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch will add calls

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#774498: base-files: please make the build reproducible

Source: base-files Version: 8 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that base-files could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch will stop recording t

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#774498: base-files: please make the build reproducible

> Tags: patch Here it is. -- Lunar.''`. lu...@debian.org: :Ⓐ : # apt-get install anarchism `. `'` `- diff -Nru base-files-8/debian/changelog base-files-8.0~reprodu

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#774496: ncurses: please make ncurses build reproducibly

Sven Joachim: > I am not strictly opposed to your patch, but I think the problem should > be tackled elsewhere, so that fewer packages need to be modified. In our experimental toolchain, packages built using `dh` will automatically call `dh_strip_nondeterminism`. Packages using `dh` are the 60% pl

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#774496: ncurses: please make ncurses build reproducibly

On Samstag, 3. Januar 2015, Jérémy Bobbio wrote: > Sven Joachim: > > Also, what's the current state of #759895? > > The original patch became part of strip-nondeterminism. I guess it > should be updated to ask the inclusion of the following patch: > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/reproducible/deb

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#774504: debianutils: please make the build reproducible

Source: debianutils Version: 4.4 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps fileordering Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that debianutils could not be built reproducibly. The attached patches ma

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#774509: python-qt4: remove timestamps in generated files to enable reproducible building

Source: python-qt4 Version: 4.11.2+dfsg-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps toolchain Hi, the uic python module and the pyrcc tool are currently embedding timestamps into the comments of generated files. This results in packages

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#774510: pyqt5: remove timestamps in generated files to enable reproducible building

Source: pyqt5 Version: 5.3.2+dfsg-3 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps toolchain Hi, the uic python module and the pyrcc tool are currently embedding timestamps into the comments of generated files. This results in packages that c

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#774537: cppreference-doc: make build reproducible

Source: cppreference-doc Version: 20140827+dfsg0-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: fileordering Hi, the package can currently not be build reproducibly, because files are not read in a deterministic order. The attached patch fixes this by