> First, is there already some kind of documentation about this problem in
> the GCC bug tracker or in the reproducible wiki?
I got no answer and think this counts as "no". I have now created a ticket
in the GCC bugtracker at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65015
Regards,
Conchúr Nav
conc...@web.de:
> > First, is there already some kind of documentation about this problem in
> > the GCC bug tracker or in the reproducible wiki?
>
> I got no answer and think this counts as "no". I have now created a ticket
> in the GCC bugtracker at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
> GCC is definitely full of unknown features. Could you try again adding
> the `-save-temps` option? It seems to make the intermediate file names
> deterministic according to my tests.
Yes, I've just tested it and it definitely works around the problem.
So it is still a problem of the intermediate
Package: strip-nondeterminism
Version: 0.003-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: toolchain timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
A patch attached with initial support for overriding timestamps
in PNG files
Source: br.ispell
Version: 3.0~beta4-17
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed
that br.ispell could n
Hi!
Now back to your comments on the code:
Guillem Jover:
> > diff --git a/debian/usertags b/debian/usertags
> > index 0fc26f2..0419488 100644
> > --- a/debian/usertags
> > +++ b/debian/usertags
> > @@ -65,6 +65,7 @@ dpkg-checkbuilddeps [DPKG-CHECKBUILDDEPS]
> > dpkg-deb [DPKG-DE
Source: taggrepper
Version: 0.05-1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed
that taggrepper could not b
Source: joe
Version: 3.7-2.4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed
that joe could not be built repro
Source: authbind
Version: 2.1.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed
that authbind could not be bui
Source: angband-doc
Version: 3.0.3.5
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed
that angband-doc could no
Source: debdelta
Version: 0.55
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed
that debdelta could not be buil
Source: cdebootstrap
Version: 0.6.4
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
X-Debbugs-Cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Hi,
While working on the "reproducible builds" effort [1], we have noticed
that cdebootstrap could no
12 matches
Mail list logo