[Reproducible-builds] Bug#787980: dpkg: please normalize file permissions when creating control.tar

Package: dpkg Version: 1.18.1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: umask toolchain Hi! As part of the “reproducible builds” effort, we are curretly trying to have Debian package build identically despite being built under different umasks. dp

Re: [Reproducible-builds] Bug#787444: help2man: support externally-supplied --date for reproducibility

On 2015-06-04 17:24, Holger Levsen wrote: > Hi, > > On Donnerstag, 4. Juni 2015, Ximin Luo wrote: >> https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/reproducible-builds/Week-of-Mon-2 >> 0150330/001317.html >> >> for details. TL;DR is to have SOURCEDATE as an environment variable in >> ISO8601 format. >>

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#787984: brickos: please make the build reproducible

Source: brickos Version: 0.9.0.dfsg-10 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that brickos could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes $dateti

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#787992: fflas-ffpack: please make the build reproducible Source:

Source: fflas-ffpack Version: 1.6.0-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that fflas-ffpack could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch changes the

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#787995: lrzsz: please make the build reproducible

Source: lrzsz Version: 0.12.21-7 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that lrzsz could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes extra timestamp

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#787996: cloop: please make the build reproducible

Source: cloop Version: 3.14.1.2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that cloop could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch tells tar to set the fil

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#787998: perdition: please make the build reproducible

Source: perdition Version: 2.1-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that perdition could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes extra times

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#787997: scotch: please make the build reproducible

Source: scotch Version: 5.1.12b.dfsg-2 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that scotch could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes extra ti

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#787999: libwebcam: please make the build reproducible

Source: libwebcam Version: 0.2.4-1.1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that libwebcam could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes extra t

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#788000: libranlip: please make the build reproducible

Source: libranlip Version: 1.0-4.1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that libranlip could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch removes extra tim

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#788001: libf2c2: please make the build reproducible

Source: libf2c2 Version: 1.0-4.1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi! While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that libf2c2 could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch sets the files mtime

[Reproducible-builds] Message with no Package: tag cannot be processed! ( Bug#788001: libf2c2: please make the build reproducible)

Your message didn't have a Package: line at the very first line of the mail body (part of the pseudo-header), or didn't have a Package: line at all. Unfortunatly, this means that your message has been ignored completely. Without this information we are unable to categorise or otherwise deal with y

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#788010: givaro: please make the build reproducible

Source: givaro Version: 3.7.2-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that givaro could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch changes the value of HT

[Reproducible-builds] Bug#788012: geis: please make the build reproducible

Source: geis Version: 2.2.16-1 Severity: wishlist Tags: patch User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Usertags: timestamps Hi, While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed that geis could not be built reproducibly. The attached patch changes the value of HTML_

[Reproducible-builds] GSoC 2015 Week 2: Move forward reproducible builds

Hello, After I finished my last university project for the current semester this Thursday, I finally started working on the "Move forward reproducible builds" project. =) I have been working on packages which are marked as affected by timestamps_in_documentation_generated_by_doxygen [1] and other

[Reproducible-builds] GSoC 2015 Week 2: Move forward reproducible builds

Hi, During this second week I continued working on fixing timestamp related issues. This week I have patched packages witch had these issues: - Timestamps of the generated files when compressed with gzip (stored in the headers) [1]. - Timestamps of the generated files stored in the debian package