Hi Vincent,
On Dienstag, 16. Juni 2015, Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> Looks like you have configuration problems on the build machine:
thanks for notifiying us. The issue has been fixed and affected packages are
about to be rescheduled.
If you're packages havent been rebuildin 24h please do conta
Source: orthanc
Version: 0.8.4+dfsg-2
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
Hi,
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that orthanc could not be built reproducibly.
The attached patch changes the valu
Много нови предложения всяка
седмица за неустоимо секси бельо и
дрехи със още по-големи
намаления от www.neustoima.bg При нас ще намерите голямо
разнообразие от над 600 артикула дамско,
секси и еротично бельо и дрехи за
показване! Стилно и елегантно дамско
бельо – сутиени,
комплекти, чо
Source: manuel
Version: 1.8.0-2
Severity: wishlist
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
Timestamp in Sphinx docs due to html_last_update_fmt. I'm going to
fix this soon.
DS
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (5
Source: rivet
Version: 1.8.3-1.1
Severity: wishlist
Tags: patch
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: timestamps
Hi,
While working on the “reproducible builds” effort [1], we have noticed
that rivet could not be built reproducibly.
The attached patch changes the value of HT
Hi,
sorry for replying so late... on the plus side, I've got a much clearer
picture now and I've implemented something similar, eg see
https://reproducible.debian.net/openwrt/
and/or
https://reproducible.debian.net/coreboot/
On the original subject of my mail: I have given up on this and will b
package: debbindiff
version: 22
User: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
Usertags: infrastructure
Hi,
from
https://jenkins.debian.net/view/reproducible/job/reproducible_openwrt/24/console
Tue 16 Jun 23:30:09 UTC 2015 - debbindiff 22+test1 found issues, please
investigate ar71xx/openwr
[I’m not subscribed, please CC me on replies]
Hi,
my inbox is full of mails with subject
"[Pkg-haskell-maintainers] Reproducibility state of package haskell-hfuse
change..."
as you can see the relevant part is cut off here. May I suggest to use
a more compact subject, e.g.
Reproducibility